Storyline
Steven Fischer entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 4.0550. Across 16 rated doubles games, the player went 6-10 and moved -0.0383, finishing at 4.0167.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 6-10 record produced +0.0542 from wins and -0.0925 from losses, for a net move of -0.0383. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0140 against Michael Czerwinski as partner and Martin Brady / Patrick Wilson as opponents. In game #13 on 2026-10-29, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 4.1136 vs opponent team 3.9680.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Steven's most common partner signals so far: Jerry Visconti (1-1, 50%), Mark Burkowski (1-1, 50%), Patrick Wilson (1-1, 50%), Jon Duke (0-2, 0%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Steven has faced Patrick Wilson 4 times - record: 0-4. A tough matchup so far.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 2-2 | 4.0550 | 4.0546 | -0.0004 |
| 2026-10-15 | 2-2 | 4.0546 | 4.0541 | -0.0005 |
| 2026-10-22 | 2-2 | 4.0541 | 4.0542 | +0.0001 |
| 2026-10-29 | 0-4 | 4.0542 | 4.0167 | -0.0375 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Rick Eldridge | Ken Hoge / Mark Burkowski | 4.0550 | +0.0119 | 4.0669 |
| 2 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Martin Brady | Mark Burkowski / Rick Eldridge | 4.0669 | -0.0060 | 4.0609 |
| 3 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 7-11 | Mark Burkowski | Ken Hoge / Martin Brady | 4.0609 | -0.0131 | 4.0478 |
| 4 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Ken Hoge | Rick Eldridge / Martin Brady | 4.0478 | +0.0068 | 4.0546 |
| 5 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 0-11 | Scott Konkel | Mark Burkowski / Jim Suminski | 4.0546 | -0.0062 | 4.0484 |
| 6 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-2 | Jim Suminski | Scott Konkel / Jerry Visconti | 4.0484 | +0.0065 | 4.0549 |
| 7 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Jerry Visconti | Mark Burkowski / Scott Konkel | 4.0549 | -0.0108 | 4.0441 |
| 8 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Mark Burkowski | Jim Suminski / Jerry Visconti | 4.0441 | +0.0100 | 4.0541 |
| 9 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Richard Edelman | Patrick Wilson / Jon Duke | 4.0541 | -0.0068 | 4.0473 |
| 10 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Jerry Visconti | Jon Duke / Richard Edelman | 4.0473 | +0.0113 | 4.0586 |
| 11 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Jon Duke | Patrick Wilson / Jerry Visconti | 4.0586 | -0.0121 | 4.0465 |
| 12 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-1 | Patrick Wilson | Richard Edelman / Jerry Visconti | 4.0465 | +0.0077 | 4.0542 |
| 13 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Michael Czerwinski | Martin Brady / Patrick Wilson | 4.0542 | -0.0140 | 4.0402 |
| 14 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Patrick Wilson | Martin Brady / Jon Duke | 4.0402 | -0.0120 | 4.0282 |
| 15 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Martin Brady | Michael Czerwinski / Jon Duke | 4.0282 | -0.0038 | 4.0244 |
| 16 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Men's Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 8-11 | Jon Duke | Michael Czerwinski / Patrick Wilson | 4.0244 | -0.0077 | 4.0167 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.0624 | 4.1307 | -0.0684 | +0.0119 |
| 2 | 3.9506 | 4.0974 | +0.1467 | -0.0060 |
| 3 | 4.0777 | 3.9675 | -0.1102 | -0.0131 |
| 4 | 4.0785 | 3.9648 | +0.1137 | +0.0068 |
| 5 | 3.9959 | 4.1364 | +0.1406 | -0.0062 |
| 6 | 4.1036 | 3.9775 | +0.1261 | +0.0065 |
| 7 | 4.0247 | 3.9977 | -0.0270 | -0.0108 |
| 8 | 4.0684 | 4.0692 | -0.0008 | +0.0100 |
| 9 | 4.0078 | 4.1224 | +0.1146 | -0.0068 |
| 10 | 4.0078 | 4.0534 | -0.0456 | +0.0113 |
| 11 | 4.1042 | 4.0284 | -0.0759 | -0.0121 |
| 12 | 4.0630 | 3.9832 | +0.0798 | +0.0077 |
| 13 | 4.1136 | 3.9680 | -0.1456 | -0.0140 |
| 14 | 4.0686 | 3.9976 | -0.0710 | -0.0120 |
| 15 | 3.9584 | 4.2107 | +0.2523 | -0.0038 |
| 16 | 4.0798 | 4.1612 | +0.0814 | -0.0077 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff -0.0684 -> computed delta +0.0119; 4.0550 +0.0119 = 4.0669