Storyline
Lauren Esterlein entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.4640. Across 40 rated doubles games, the player went 25-15 and moved +0.0447, finishing at 2.5087.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 25-15 record produced +0.2121 from wins and -0.1674 from losses, for a net move of +0.0447. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0170 against Deborah Austin as partner and Barbara Giometti / Lynne Becker as opponents. In game #28 on 2026-09-24, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.5195 vs opponent team 2.2187.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Lauren's most common partner signals so far: Cindy Halcomb (4-2, 67%), Lynne Becker (4-2, 67%), Janet Krasinski (3-2, 60%), Missi Horton (3-2, 60%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Lauren has faced Lynne Becker 12 times - record: 8-4. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | 2-2 | 2.4640 | 2.4579 | -0.0061 |
| 2026-08-20 | 1-3 | 2.4579 | 2.4442 | -0.0137 |
| 2026-08-27 | 1-3 | 2.4442 | 2.4202 | -0.0240 |
| 2026-09-03 | 3-1 | 2.4202 | 2.4319 | +0.0117 |
| 2026-09-10 | 4-0 | 2.4319 | 2.4562 | +0.0243 |
| 2026-09-17 | 3-1 | 2.4562 | 2.4697 | +0.0135 |
| 2026-09-24 | 2-2 | 2.4697 | 2.4632 | -0.0065 |
| 2026-10-15 | 3-1 | 2.4632 | 2.4763 | +0.0131 |
| 2026-10-22 | 2-2 | 2.4763 | 2.4736 | -0.0027 |
| 2026-10-29 | 4-0 | 2.4736 | 2.5087 | +0.0351 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-02 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Janet Krasinski | Cindy Halcomb / Lynne Becker | 2.4640 | -0.0139 | 2.4501 |
| 2 | 2026-07-02 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 8-11 | Lynne Becker | Cindy Halcomb / Missi Horton | 2.4501 | -0.0078 | 2.4423 |
| 3 | 2026-07-02 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Cindy Halcomb | Janet Krasinski / Missi Horton | 2.4423 | +0.0084 | 2.4507 |
| 4 | 2026-07-02 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Missi Horton | Janet Krasinski / Lynne Becker | 2.4507 | +0.0072 | 2.4579 |
| 5 | 2026-08-20 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-5 | Jackie Huckins | Deborah Austin / Missi Horton | 2.4579 | +0.0108 | 2.4687 |
| 6 | 2026-08-20 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Wendy Bachman | Deborah Austin / Jackie Huckins | 2.4687 | -0.0061 | 2.4626 |
| 7 | 2026-08-20 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Missi Horton | Wendy Bachman / Jackie Huckins | 2.4626 | -0.0061 | 2.4565 |
| 8 | 2026-08-20 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Deborah Austin | Wendy Bachman / Missi Horton | 2.4565 | -0.0123 | 2.4442 |
| 9 | 2026-08-27 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 0-11 | Janet Krasinski | Missi Horton / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4442 | -0.0091 | 2.4351 |
| 10 | 2026-08-27 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Lynne Becker | Cindy Halcomb / Janet Krasinski | 2.4351 | -0.0068 | 2.4283 |
| 11 | 2026-08-27 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Cindy Halcomb | Missi Horton / Lynne Becker | 2.4283 | -0.0142 | 2.4141 |
| 12 | 2026-08-27 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-5 | Missi Horton | Janet Krasinski / Lynne Becker | 2.4141 | +0.0061 | 2.4202 |
| 13 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Cindy Halcomb | Janet Krasinski / Lynne Becker | 2.4202 | -0.0142 | 2.4060 |
| 14 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Lynne Becker | Janet Krasinski / Christine Martin | 2.4060 | +0.0073 | 2.4133 |
| 15 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Janet Krasinski | Cindy Halcomb / Christine Martin | 2.4133 | +0.0056 | 2.4189 |
| 16 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Christine Martin | Cindy Halcomb / Lynne Becker | 2.4189 | +0.0130 | 2.4319 |
| 17 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Cindy Halcomb | Lynne Becker / Bev Buescher | 2.4319 | +0.0022 | 2.4341 |
| 18 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Bev Buescher | Lynne Becker / Cathy Loughridge | 2.4341 | +0.0065 | 2.4406 |
| 19 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Lynne Becker | Cindy Halcomb / Cathy Loughridge | 2.4406 | +0.0034 | 2.4440 |
| 20 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Cathy Loughridge | Cindy Halcomb / Bev Buescher | 2.4440 | +0.0122 | 2.4562 |
| 21 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Janet Krasinski | Deborah Austin / Barbara Giometti | 2.4562 | +0.0082 | 2.4644 |
| 22 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Marie Shuey | Barbara Giometti / Janet Krasinski | 2.4644 | +0.0070 | 2.4714 |
| 23 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-2 | Barbara Giometti | Deborah Austin / Marie Shuey | 2.4714 | +0.0139 | 2.4853 |
| 24 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Deborah Austin | Janet Krasinski / Marie Shuey | 2.4853 | -0.0156 | 2.4697 |
| 25 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 7-11 | Missi Horton | Deborah Austin / Barbara Giometti | 2.4697 | -0.0128 | 2.4569 |
| 26 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Barbara Giometti | Deborah Austin / Lynne Becker | 2.4569 | +0.0130 | 2.4699 |
| 27 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-2 | Lynne Becker | Barbara Giometti / Deborah Austin | 2.4699 | +0.0103 | 2.4802 |
| 28 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Deborah Austin | Barbara Giometti / Lynne Becker | 2.4802 | -0.0170 | 2.4632 |
| 29 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-7 | Missi Horton | Barbara Giometti / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4632 | +0.0065 | 2.4697 |
| 30 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 8-11 | Nancy Wart | Cindy Halcomb / Missi Horton | 2.4697 | -0.0080 | 2.4617 |
| 31 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-10 | Cindy Halcomb | Barbara Giometti / Nancy Wart | 2.4617 | +0.0046 | 2.4663 |
| 32 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-7 | Barbara Giometti | Missi Horton / Nancy Wart | 2.4663 | +0.0100 | 2.4763 |
| 33 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Karen Sykes | Janet Krasinski / Marcia Adelman | 2.4763 | -0.0120 | 2.4643 |
| 34 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Marcia Adelman | Janet Krasinski / Debra Fox | 2.4643 | -0.0115 | 2.4528 |
| 35 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Janet Krasinski | Karen Sykes / Debra Fox | 2.4528 | +0.0102 | 2.4630 |
| 36 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-2 | Debra Fox | Karen Sykes / Marcia Adelman | 2.4630 | +0.0106 | 2.4736 |
| 37 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Marcia Adelman | Lynne Becker / Karen Sykes | 2.4736 | +0.0066 | 2.4802 |
| 38 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Cindy Halcomb | Marcia Adelman / Lynne Becker | 2.4802 | +0.0073 | 2.4875 |
| 39 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Lynne Becker | Karen Sykes / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4875 | +0.0124 | 2.4999 |
| 40 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Karen Sykes | Marcia Adelman / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4999 | +0.0088 | 2.5087 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.4346 | 2.2922 | -0.1424 | -0.0139 |
| 2 | 2.3107 | 2.3874 | +0.0767 | -0.0078 |
| 3 | 2.4424 | 2.3848 | +0.0576 | +0.0084 |
| 4 | 2.3873 | 2.2876 | +0.0997 | +0.0072 |
| 5 | 2.4980 | 2.5241 | -0.0261 | +0.0108 |
| 6 | 2.4986 | 2.6404 | +0.1418 | -0.0061 |
| 7 | 2.4332 | 2.5760 | +0.1428 | -0.0061 |
| 8 | 2.5402 | 2.4606 | -0.0796 | -0.0123 |
| 9 | 2.4047 | 2.4360 | +0.0314 | -0.0091 |
| 10 | 2.2896 | 2.4050 | +0.1155 | -0.0068 |
| 11 | 2.4419 | 2.2851 | -0.1568 | -0.0142 |
| 12 | 2.4249 | 2.2798 | +0.1451 | +0.0061 |
| 13 | 2.4358 | 2.2789 | -0.1569 | -0.0142 |
| 14 | 2.3007 | 2.2052 | +0.0955 | +0.0073 |
| 15 | 2.3853 | 2.2234 | +0.1619 | +0.0056 |
| 16 | 2.2189 | 2.3262 | -0.1072 | +0.0130 |
| 17 | 2.4259 | 2.0662 | +0.3598 | +0.0022 |
| 18 | 2.1151 | 1.9901 | +0.1250 | +0.0065 |
| 19 | 2.3122 | 2.0341 | +0.2781 | +0.0034 |
| 20 | 2.0360 | 2.1154 | -0.0794 | +0.0122 |
| 21 | 2.3909 | 2.3273 | +0.0636 | +0.0082 |
| 22 | 2.3452 | 2.2363 | +0.1088 | +0.0070 |
| 23 | 2.2615 | 2.4048 | -0.1433 | +0.0139 |
| 24 | 2.5296 | 2.3103 | -0.2193 | -0.0156 |
| 25 | 2.4148 | 2.3134 | -0.1014 | -0.0128 |
| 26 | 2.2729 | 2.3810 | -0.1081 | +0.0130 |
| 27 | 2.3226 | 2.3314 | -0.0088 | +0.0103 |
| 28 | 2.5195 | 2.2187 | -0.3008 | -0.0170 |
| 29 | 2.3999 | 2.2732 | +0.1267 | +0.0065 |
| 30 | 2.3166 | 2.3871 | +0.0705 | -0.0080 |
| 31 | 2.4278 | 2.2180 | +0.2097 | +0.0046 |
| 32 | 2.2818 | 2.2831 | -0.0013 | +0.0100 |
| 33 | 2.4786 | 2.4077 | -0.0709 | -0.0120 |
| 34 | 2.4573 | 2.4053 | -0.0520 | -0.0115 |
| 35 | 2.4273 | 2.4341 | -0.0068 | +0.0102 |
| 36 | 2.4316 | 2.4518 | -0.0202 | +0.0106 |
| 37 | 2.4520 | 2.3278 | +0.1241 | +0.0066 |
| 38 | 2.4211 | 2.3232 | +0.0978 | +0.0073 |
| 39 | 2.3276 | 2.4143 | -0.0866 | +0.0124 |
| 40 | 2.4496 | 2.4080 | +0.0417 | +0.0088 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff -0.1424 -> computed delta -0.0139; 2.4640 -0.0139 = 2.4501