Initial VIPR
2.9300
Registry seed
Current VIPR
2.8883
After latest rated game
Net Movement
-0.0417
Current minus initial
Record
11-13
46% win rate · 24 rated games
Storyline
Kim Johnson entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.9300. Across 24 rated doubles games, the player went 11-13 and moved -0.0417, finishing at 2.8883.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 11-13 record produced +0.0884 from wins and -0.1301 from losses, for a net move of -0.0417. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0180 against Carol Spano as partner and Beth Arms / Pamela Uriarte as opponents. In game #13 on 2026-09-03, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.6952 vs opponent team 2.3165.
Partner Chemistry
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Kim's most common partner signals so far: Beth Arms (3-3, 50%), Barbara Amato (1-2, 33%), Pamela Uriarte (1-1, 50%), Mary LaFrancois (0-2, 0%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Streaks & Rivalries
Rivalry
Kim has faced Beth Arms 11 times - record: 5-6. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | 1-3 | 2.9300 | 2.9053 | -0.0247 |
| 2026-07-16 | 1-3 | 2.9053 | 2.8829 | -0.0224 |
| 2026-08-06 | 4-0 | 2.8829 | 2.9131 | +0.0302 |
| 2026-09-03 | 2-2 | 2.9131 | 2.9101 | -0.0030 |
| 2026-09-10 | 1-3 | 2.9101 | 2.8888 | -0.0213 |
| 2026-09-24 | 2-2 | 2.8888 | 2.8883 | -0.0005 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Dawn Mead | Nancy Krau / Mary LaFrancois | 2.9300 | +0.0085 | 2.9385 |
| 2 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Barbara Amato | Mary LaFrancois / Dawn Mead | 2.9385 | -0.0074 | 2.9311 |
| 3 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Mary LaFrancois | Nancy Krau / Barbara Amato | 2.9311 | -0.0131 | 2.9180 |
| 4 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Nancy Krau | Dawn Mead / Barbara Amato | 2.9180 | -0.0127 | 2.9053 |
| 5 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Tammy Wilson | Kathi Lancaster / Beth Arms | 2.9053 | -0.0047 | 2.9006 |
| 6 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Fern S Reisinger | Beth Arms / Tammy Wilson | 2.9006 | -0.0098 | 2.8908 |
| 7 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 8-11 | Beth Arms | Kathi Lancaster / Fern S Reisinger | 2.8908 | -0.0113 | 2.8795 |
| 8 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Kathi Lancaster | Tammy Wilson / Fern S Reisinger | 2.8795 | +0.0034 | 2.8829 |
| 9 | 2026-08-06 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-10 | Beth Arms | Debbie Chaffee / Pilar Winters | 2.8829 | +0.0056 | 2.8885 |
| 10 | 2026-08-06 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Pilar Winters | Debbie Chaffee / Wendy Bachman | 2.8885 | +0.0090 | 2.8975 |
| 11 | 2026-08-06 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Debbie Chaffee | Beth Arms / Wendy Bachman | 2.8975 | +0.0047 | 2.9022 |
| 12 | 2026-08-06 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Wendy Bachman | Beth Arms / Pilar Winters | 2.9022 | +0.0109 | 2.9131 |
| 13 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Carol Spano | Beth Arms / Pamela Uriarte | 2.9131 | -0.0180 | 2.8951 |
| 14 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Beth Arms | Carol Spano / Pamela Uriarte | 2.8951 | +0.0005 | 2.8956 |
| 15 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-10 | Pamela Uriarte | Carol Spano / Beth Arms | 2.8956 | +0.0175 | 2.9131 |
| 16 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Pamela Uriarte | Carol Spano / Beth Arms | 2.9131 | -0.0030 | 2.9101 |
| 17 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Beth Arms | Diane Polansky / Barbara Amato | 2.9101 | -0.0094 | 2.9007 |
| 18 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 7-11 | Darleen Obrien | Barbara Amato / Beth Arms | 2.9007 | -0.0103 | 2.8904 |
| 19 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Barbara Amato | Diane Polansky / Darleen Obrien | 2.8904 | -0.0087 | 2.8817 |
| 20 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Diane Polansky | Beth Arms / Darleen Obrien | 2.8817 | +0.0071 | 2.8888 |
| 21 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Beth Arms | Mary LaFrancois / Barbara Amato | 2.8888 | -0.0100 | 2.8788 |
| 22 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Mary LaFrancois | Barbara Amato / Beth Arms | 2.8788 | -0.0117 | 2.8671 |
| 23 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Barbara Amato | Mary LaFrancois / Beth Arms | 2.8671 | +0.0104 | 2.8775 |
| 24 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Beth Arms | Mary LaFrancois / Barbara Amato | 2.8775 | +0.0108 | 2.8883 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9330 | 2.8821 | +0.0509 | +0.0085 |
| 2 | 2.8008 | 2.8925 | +0.0917 | -0.0074 |
| 3 | 2.8925 | 2.7797 | -0.1127 | -0.0131 |
| 4 | 2.9044 | 2.8100 | -0.0944 | -0.0127 |
| 5 | 2.7764 | 2.9805 | +0.2041 | -0.0047 |
| 6 | 2.7613 | 2.7676 | +0.0063 | -0.0098 |
| 7 | 2.8926 | 2.8486 | -0.0439 | -0.0113 |
| 8 | 2.9834 | 2.7101 | +0.2734 | +0.0034 |
| 9 | 2.8674 | 2.7053 | +0.1621 | +0.0056 |
| 10 | 2.7066 | 2.6719 | +0.0347 | +0.0090 |
| 11 | 2.8687 | 2.6659 | +0.2028 | +0.0047 |
| 12 | 2.6709 | 2.7035 | -0.0325 | +0.0109 |
| 13 | 2.6952 | 2.3165 | -0.3787 | -0.0180 |
| 14 | 2.8876 | 2.2443 | +0.6433 | +0.0005 |
| 15 | 2.3375 | 2.6738 | -0.3363 | +0.0175 |
| 16 | 2.3550 | 2.6563 | +0.3013 | -0.0030 |
| 17 | 2.8823 | 2.9021 | +0.0198 | -0.0094 |
| 18 | 2.8530 | 2.8427 | -0.0102 | -0.0103 |
| 19 | 2.8588 | 2.9027 | +0.0439 | -0.0087 |
| 20 | 2.9469 | 2.8430 | +0.1039 | +0.0071 |
| 21 | 2.8574 | 2.8585 | +0.0010 | -0.0100 |
| 22 | 2.8960 | 2.8357 | -0.0603 | -0.0117 |
| 23 | 2.8560 | 2.8693 | -0.0133 | +0.0104 |
| 24 | 2.8480 | 2.8773 | -0.0294 | +0.0108 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0509 -> computed delta +0.0085; 2.9300 +0.0085 = 2.9385