Storyline
Jolynne Colvin entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 3.6570. Across 20 rated doubles games, the player went 9-11 and moved -0.0513, finishing at 3.6057.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 9-11 record produced +0.0747 from wins and -0.1260 from losses, for a net move of -0.0513. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0173 against Laura Marchisello as partner and Jean Narod / Sharon McFarland as opponents. In game #12 on 2026-07-23, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 3.7403 vs opponent team 3.4169.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Jolynne's most common partner signals so far: Sharon McFarland (2-2, 50%), Carolyn Roan (2-1, 67%), Diane McCarthy (0-2, 0%), Gina M Park (1-0, 100%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Jolynne has faced Sharon McFarland 8 times - record: 4-4. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | 3-1 | 3.6570 | 3.6691 | +0.0121 |
| 2026-07-16 | 4-0 | 3.6691 | 3.7014 | +0.0323 |
| 2026-07-23 | 0-4 | 3.7014 | 3.6564 | -0.0450 |
| 2026-08-13 | 1-3 | 3.6564 | 3.6306 | -0.0258 |
| 2026-08-20 | 1-3 | 3.6306 | 3.6057 | -0.0249 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-4 | Sally Musser | Sharon McFarland / Christine Ressler | 3.6570 | +0.0061 | 3.6631 |
| 2 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-10 | Carolyn Roan | Sally Musser / Sharon McFarland | 3.6631 | +0.0093 | 3.6724 |
| 3 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-10 | Sharon McFarland | Christine Ressler / Carolyn Roan | 3.6724 | +0.0087 | 3.6811 |
| 4 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 2-11 | Christine Ressler | Sally Musser / Carolyn Roan | 3.6811 | -0.0120 | 3.6691 |
| 5 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-6 | Nancy Pierce | Sharon McFarland / Carolyn Roan | 3.6691 | +0.0042 | 3.6733 |
| 6 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-6 | Stephanie Chen | Nancy Pierce / Sharon McFarland | 3.6733 | +0.0090 | 3.6823 |
| 7 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-4 | Sharon McFarland | Carolyn Roan / Stephanie Chen | 3.6823 | +0.0089 | 3.6912 |
| 8 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-7 | Carolyn Roan | Nancy Pierce / Stephanie Chen | 3.6912 | +0.0102 | 3.7014 |
| 9 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 1-11 | Jean Narod | Laura Marchisello / Erin DeFrates | 3.7014 | -0.0038 | 3.6976 |
| 10 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 4-11 | Sharon McFarland | Erin DeFrates / Jean Narod | 3.6976 | -0.0098 | 3.6878 |
| 11 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 5-11 | Erin DeFrates | Laura Marchisello / Sharon McFarland | 3.6878 | -0.0141 | 3.6737 |
| 12 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 9-11 | Laura Marchisello | Jean Narod / Sharon McFarland | 3.6737 | -0.0173 | 3.6564 |
| 13 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-8 | Michele Blanchard | Jeanan Delp / Diane McCarthy | 3.6564 | +0.0069 | 3.6633 |
| 14 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 8-11 | Diane McCarthy | Jeanan Delp / Carolyn Roan | 3.6633 | -0.0128 | 3.6505 |
| 15 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 6-11 | Jeanan Delp | Michele Blanchard / Carolyn Roan | 3.6505 | -0.0107 | 3.6398 |
| 16 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 5-11 | Carolyn Roan | Michele Blanchard / Diane McCarthy | 3.6398 | -0.0092 | 3.6306 |
| 17 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 1-11 | Diane McCarthy | Sandy Zutter / Sharon McFarland | 3.6306 | -0.0117 | 3.6189 |
| 18 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-6 | Gina M Park | Diane McCarthy / Sandy Zutter | 3.6189 | +0.0114 | 3.6303 |
| 19 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 6-11 | Sandy Zutter | Sharon McFarland / Gina M Park | 3.6303 | -0.0137 | 3.6166 |
| 20 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 8-11 | Sharon McFarland | Diane McCarthy / Gina M Park | 3.6166 | -0.0109 | 3.6057 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.5919 | 3.4497 | +0.1422 | +0.0061 |
| 2 | 3.4946 | 3.4693 | +0.0253 | +0.0093 |
| 3 | 3.4911 | 3.4467 | +0.0444 | +0.0087 |
| 4 | 3.5355 | 3.4667 | -0.0688 | -0.0120 |
| 5 | 3.6578 | 3.4260 | +0.2319 | +0.0042 |
| 6 | 3.5204 | 3.4865 | +0.0340 | +0.0090 |
| 7 | 3.4852 | 3.4464 | +0.0388 | +0.0089 |
| 8 | 3.5084 | 3.5154 | -0.0070 | +0.0102 |
| 9 | 3.5028 | 3.7573 | +0.2545 | -0.0038 |
| 10 | 3.4961 | 3.5026 | +0.0065 | -0.0098 |
| 11 | 3.6972 | 3.5444 | -0.1529 | -0.0141 |
| 12 | 3.7403 | 3.4169 | -0.3234 | -0.0173 |
| 13 | 3.6371 | 3.5261 | +0.1111 | +0.0069 |
| 14 | 3.5848 | 3.4844 | -0.1004 | -0.0128 |
| 15 | 3.5580 | 3.5324 | -0.0255 | -0.0107 |
| 16 | 3.5489 | 3.5752 | +0.0263 | -0.0092 |
| 17 | 3.5802 | 3.5193 | -0.0609 | -0.0117 |
| 18 | 3.5123 | 3.5626 | -0.0503 | +0.0114 |
| 19 | 3.6171 | 3.4803 | -0.1368 | -0.0137 |
| 20 | 3.5346 | 3.5018 | -0.0329 | -0.0109 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.1422 -> computed delta +0.0061; 3.6570 +0.0061 = 3.6631