VIPR Rating Audit Trail

Coni Lentz

Member ID: TVCPC-P0292   Generated: 2026-09-04 12:10 PM

2.5070 -> 2.4868
Net -0.0202   Record 12-12   Win Rate 50%   Games 24
Initial VIPR
2.5070
Registry seed
Current VIPR
2.4868
After latest rated game
Net Movement
-0.0202
Current minus initial
Record
12-12
50% win rate · 24 rated games

Storyline

Coni Lentz entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.5070. Across 24 rated doubles games, the player went 12-12 and moved -0.0202, finishing at 2.4868.

Why It Moved

AI-generated explanation: The 12-12 record produced +0.0987 from wins and -0.1189 from losses, for a net move of -0.0202. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0172 against Wendy Bachman as partner and Amy Fortier / Cynthia Speiran as opponents. In game #17 on 2026-08-27, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.5167 vs opponent team 2.1989.

Partner Chemistry

Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.

Coni's most common partner signals so far: Kim Held (3-1, 75%), Marcia Adelman (2-1, 67%), Deborah Austin (1-2, 33%), Janet Krasinski (2-0, 100%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.

Streaks & Rivalries
Rivalry

Coni has faced Marcia Adelman 8 times - record: 4-4. A close matchup worth watching.

Session Summary

DateW-LStartEndNet
2026-07-02 1-3 2.5070 2.4833 -0.0237
2026-07-09 3-1 2.4833 2.4940 +0.0107
2026-07-23 1-3 2.4940 2.4708 -0.0232
2026-08-06 3-1 2.4708 2.4879 +0.0171
2026-08-27 1-3 2.4879 2.4647 -0.0232
2026-09-03 3-1 2.4647 2.4868 +0.0221

Game-By-Game Rating Trail

#DateResultScorePartnerOpponentsBeforeChangeAfter
1 2026-07-02 Loss 10-11 Cynthia Speiran Kim Held / Lori Stiegler 2.5070 -0.0107 2.4963
2 2026-07-02 Loss 7-11 Deborah Homan Cynthia Speiran / Kim Held 2.4963 -0.0088 2.4875
3 2026-07-02 Win 11-6 Kim Held Lori Stiegler / Deborah Homan 2.4875 +0.0077 2.4952
4 2026-07-02 Loss 7-11 Lori Stiegler Cynthia Speiran / Deborah Homan 2.4952 -0.0119 2.4833
5 2026-07-09 Win 11-7 Kim Held Deborah Homan / Janet Krasinski 2.4833 +0.0073 2.4906
6 2026-07-09 Win 11-9 Janet Krasinski Deborah Homan / Amy Fortier 2.4906 +0.0031 2.4937
7 2026-07-09 Win 11-5 Deborah Homan Kim Held / Amy Fortier 2.4937 +0.0039 2.4976
8 2026-07-09 Loss 8-11 Amy Fortier Kim Held / Janet Krasinski 2.4976 -0.0036 2.4940
9 2026-07-23 Win 11-9 Kim Held Marjorie Fassnacht / Marcia Adelman 2.4940 +0.0086 2.5026
10 2026-07-23 Loss 3-11 Marjorie Fassnacht Kim Held / Marcia Adelman 2.5026 -0.0107 2.4919
11 2026-07-23 Loss 0-11 Marcia Adelman Kim Held / Marjorie Fassnacht 2.4919 -0.0095 2.4824
12 2026-07-23 Loss 10-11 Kim Held Marjorie Fassnacht / Marcia Adelman 2.4824 -0.0116 2.4708
13 2026-08-06 Loss 8-11 Deborah Austin Marcia Adelman / Janet Krasinski 2.4708 -0.0144 2.4564
14 2026-08-06 Win 11-8 Janet Krasinski Deborah Austin / Marcia Adelman 2.4564 +0.0137 2.4701
15 2026-08-06 Win 11-6 Marcia Adelman Deborah Austin / Janet Krasinski 2.4701 +0.0118 2.4819
16 2026-08-06 Win 11-4 Deborah Austin Marcia Adelman / Janet Krasinski 2.4819 +0.0060 2.4879
17 2026-08-27 Loss 3-11 Wendy Bachman Amy Fortier / Cynthia Speiran 2.4879 -0.0172 2.4707
18 2026-08-27 Win 11-8 Fern S Reisinger Amy Fortier / Wendy Bachman 2.4707 +0.0029 2.4736
19 2026-08-27 Loss 8-11 Cynthia Speiran Fern S Reisinger / Wendy Bachman 2.4736 -0.0069 2.4667
20 2026-08-27 Loss 5-11 Amy Fortier Fern S Reisinger / Cynthia Speiran 2.4667 -0.0020 2.4647
21 2026-09-03 Win 11-5 Jackie Huckins Deborah Austin / Missi Horton 2.4647 +0.0105 2.4752
22 2026-09-03 Win 11-6 Missi Horton Deborah Austin / Marcia Adelman 2.4752 +0.0121 2.4873
23 2026-09-03 Loss 10-11 Deborah Austin Jackie Huckins / Marcia Adelman 2.4873 -0.0116 2.4757
24 2026-09-03 Win 11-2 Marcia Adelman Jackie Huckins / Missi Horton 2.4757 +0.0111 2.4868

Formula Homework

These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.

#Player Team ( AVG )Opponent Team ( AVG )Winner-Loser VIPR DiffComputed Delta
1 2.4734 2.4490 -0.0244 -0.0107
2 2.4197 2.4617 +0.0420 -0.0088
3 2.4825 2.4026 +0.0799 +0.0077
4 2.4651 2.3991 -0.0660 -0.0119
5 2.4847 2.3872 +0.0975 +0.0073
6 2.4212 2.1264 +0.2948 +0.0031
7 2.4084 2.1604 +0.2480 +0.0039
8 2.1560 2.4223 +0.2663 -0.0036
9 2.4953 2.4473 +0.0480 +0.0086
10 2.4759 2.4515 -0.0244 -0.0107
11 2.4545 2.4729 +0.0184 -0.0095
12 2.4958 2.4392 -0.0566 -0.0116
13 2.5641 2.3979 -0.1662 -0.0144
14 2.4128 2.5487 -0.1359 +0.0137
15 2.4499 2.5116 -0.0617 +0.0118
16 2.5599 2.4131 +0.1468 +0.0060
17 2.5167 2.1989 -0.3178 -0.0172
18 2.5369 2.2264 +0.3105 +0.0029
19 2.4913 2.6029 +0.1117 -0.0069
20 2.1943 2.5782 +0.3839 -0.0020
21 2.5057 2.5216 -0.0159 +0.0105
22 2.4455 2.5210 -0.0755 +0.0121
23 2.5456 2.4880 -0.0576 -0.0116
24 2.4658 2.5045 -0.0387 +0.0111

Rating movement formula

Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.

Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).

Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.

Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.

First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff -0.0244 -> computed delta -0.0107; 2.5070 -0.0107 = 2.4963