Storyline
Fern S Reisinger entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.6930. Across 20 rated doubles games, the player went 10-10 and moved +0.0101, finishing at 2.7031.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 10-10 record produced +0.0861 from wins and -0.0760 from losses, for a net move of +0.0101. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0189 against Michele Chew as partner and Amy Fortier / Laurie Watson as opponents. In game #10 on 2026-08-13, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.7274 vs opponent team 2.2249.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Fern's most common partner signals so far: Debbie Chaffee (1-1, 50%), Nancy Krau (1-1, 50%), Amy Fortier (0-2, 0%), ANN DREWEK (1-0, 100%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Fern has faced Amy Fortier 4 times - record: 3-1. Clear ownership of the matchup.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | 2-2 | 2.6930 | 2.7016 | +0.0086 |
| 2026-07-16 | 2-2 | 2.7016 | 2.7130 | +0.0114 |
| 2026-08-13 | 2-2 | 2.7130 | 2.7041 | -0.0089 |
| 2026-08-20 | 1-3 | 2.7041 | 2.6947 | -0.0094 |
| 2026-08-27 | 3-1 | 2.6947 | 2.7031 | +0.0084 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 3-11 | Darleen Obrien | Debbie Chaffee / ANN DREWEK | 2.6930 | -0.0094 | 2.6836 |
| 2 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 4-11 | Deborah Austin | Debbie Chaffee / Darleen Obrien | 2.6836 | -0.0069 | 2.6767 |
| 3 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-7 | ANN DREWEK | Deborah Austin / Darleen Obrien | 2.6767 | +0.0140 | 2.6907 |
| 4 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-3 | Debbie Chaffee | Deborah Austin / ANN DREWEK | 2.6907 | +0.0109 | 2.7016 |
| 5 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 5-11 | Kim Johnson | Beth Arms / Tammy Wilson | 2.7016 | -0.0098 | 2.6918 |
| 6 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-8 | Kathi Lancaster | Beth Arms / Kim Johnson | 2.6918 | +0.0113 | 2.7031 |
| 7 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 6-11 | Tammy Wilson | Kathi Lancaster / Kim Johnson | 2.7031 | -0.0034 | 2.6997 |
| 8 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-4 | Beth Arms | Kathi Lancaster / Tammy Wilson | 2.6997 | +0.0133 | 2.7130 |
| 9 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 6-11 | Amy Fortier | Nancy Krau / Michele Chew | 2.7130 | -0.0008 | 2.7122 |
| 10 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 9-11 | Michele Chew | Amy Fortier / Laurie Watson | 2.7122 | -0.0189 | 2.6933 |
| 11 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-9 | Laurie Watson | Nancy Krau / Amy Fortier | 2.6933 | +0.0019 | 2.6952 |
| 12 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-7 | Nancy Krau | Michele Chew / Laurie Watson | 2.6952 | +0.0089 | 2.7041 |
| 13 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 3-11 | Cathy Shaw | Nancy Krau / Barbara Amato | 2.7041 | -0.0083 | 2.6958 |
| 14 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 7-11 | Debbie Chaffee | Nancy Krau / Cathy Shaw | 2.6958 | -0.0065 | 2.6893 |
| 15 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-9 | Barbara Amato | Debbie Chaffee / Cathy Shaw | 2.6893 | +0.0140 | 2.7033 |
| 16 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 10-11 | Nancy Krau | Debbie Chaffee / Barbara Amato | 2.7033 | -0.0086 | 2.6947 |
| 17 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 6-11 | Amy Fortier | Wendy Bachman / Cynthia Speiran | 2.6947 | -0.0034 | 2.6913 |
| 18 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-8 | Coni Lentz | Amy Fortier / Wendy Bachman | 2.6913 | +0.0029 | 2.6942 |
| 19 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-8 | Wendy Bachman | Cynthia Speiran / Coni Lentz | 2.6942 | +0.0069 | 2.7011 |
| 20 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-5 | Cynthia Speiran | Amy Fortier / Coni Lentz | 2.7011 | +0.0020 | 2.7031 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.7398 | 2.7620 | +0.0222 | -0.0094 |
| 2 | 2.7324 | 2.8437 | +0.1113 | -0.0069 |
| 3 | 2.6946 | 2.8415 | -0.1469 | +0.0140 |
| 4 | 2.7415 | 2.7729 | -0.0313 | +0.0109 |
| 5 | 2.7613 | 2.7676 | +0.0063 | -0.0098 |
| 6 | 2.8486 | 2.8926 | -0.0439 | +0.0113 |
| 7 | 2.7101 | 2.9834 | +0.2734 | -0.0034 |
| 8 | 2.7554 | 2.8748 | -0.1194 | +0.0133 |
| 9 | 2.2366 | 2.7980 | +0.5614 | -0.0008 |
| 10 | 2.7274 | 2.2249 | -0.5025 | -0.0189 |
| 11 | 2.6941 | 2.2996 | +0.3945 | +0.0019 |
| 12 | 2.7511 | 2.7114 | +0.0397 | +0.0089 |
| 13 | 2.7540 | 2.8143 | +0.0602 | -0.0083 |
| 14 | 2.7482 | 2.8758 | +0.1276 | -0.0065 |
| 15 | 2.7184 | 2.8654 | -0.1470 | +0.0140 |
| 16 | 2.7664 | 2.8152 | +0.0488 | -0.0086 |
| 17 | 2.2551 | 2.5325 | +0.2774 | -0.0034 |
| 18 | 2.5369 | 2.2264 | +0.3105 | +0.0029 |
| 19 | 2.6029 | 2.4913 | +0.1117 | +0.0069 |
| 20 | 2.5782 | 2.1943 | +0.3839 | +0.0020 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0222 -> computed delta -0.0094; 2.6930 -0.0094 = 2.6836