Initial VIPR
2.0000
Registry seed
Current VIPR
1.9741
After latest rated game
Net Movement
-0.0259
Current minus initial
Record
9-15
38% win rate · 24 rated games
Storyline
Bev Buescher entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.0000. Across 24 rated doubles games, the player went 9-15 and moved -0.0259, finishing at 1.9741.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 9-15 record produced +0.0881 from wins and -0.1140 from losses, for a net move of -0.0259. The biggest single-game impact was +0.0158 against Catherine Rozmiarek as partner and Terri Pelant / Helen Burns as opponents. In game #9 on 2026-09-24, the player's team was the lower-rated team, so the win carried a larger gain: player team 1.9591 vs opponent team 2.1879.
Partner Chemistry
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Bev's most common partner signals so far: Cathy Loughridge (0-5, 0%), Lisa Lepping (1-2, 33%), Peggy Salazar (1-2, 33%), Helen Burns (2-0, 100%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Streaks & Rivalries
Rivalry
Bev has faced Cathy Loughridge 8 times - record: 4-4. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-03 | 1-3 | 2.0000 | 1.9806 | -0.0194 |
| 2026-09-10 | 1-3 | 1.9806 | 1.9710 | -0.0096 |
| 2026-09-24 | 3-1 | 1.9710 | 1.9939 | +0.0229 |
| 2026-10-01 | 3-1 | 1.9939 | 2.0213 | +0.0274 |
| 2026-10-15 | 0-4 | 2.0213 | 1.9908 | -0.0305 |
| 2026-10-22 | 1-3 | 1.9908 | 1.9741 | -0.0167 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Helen Burns | Cathy Loughridge / Catherine Rozmiarek | 2.0000 | +0.0068 | 2.0068 |
| 2 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Catherine Rozmiarek | Helen Burns / Cathy Loughridge | 2.0068 | -0.0110 | 1.9958 |
| 3 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 7-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Helen Burns / Catherine Rozmiarek | 1.9958 | -0.0078 | 1.9880 |
| 4 | 2026-09-03 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Helen Burns / Catherine Rozmiarek | 1.9880 | -0.0074 | 1.9806 |
| 5 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Lynne Becker | Cindy Halcomb / Lauren Esterlein | 1.9806 | -0.0022 | 1.9784 |
| 6 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Lauren Esterlein | Lynne Becker / Cathy Loughridge | 1.9784 | +0.0065 | 1.9849 |
| 7 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Cindy Halcomb / Lynne Becker | 1.9849 | -0.0017 | 1.9832 |
| 8 | 2026-09-10 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Cindy Halcomb | Lauren Esterlein / Cathy Loughridge | 1.9832 | -0.0122 | 1.9710 |
| 9 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-10 | Catherine Rozmiarek | Terri Pelant / Helen Burns | 1.9710 | +0.0158 | 1.9868 |
| 10 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Helen Burns | Catherine Rozmiarek / Cathy Loughridge | 1.9868 | +0.0065 | 1.9933 |
| 11 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Terri Pelant / Catherine Rozmiarek | 1.9933 | -0.0054 | 1.9879 |
| 12 | 2026-09-24 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-5 | Terri Pelant | Helen Burns / Cathy Loughridge | 1.9879 | +0.0060 | 1.9939 |
| 13 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Tracy Klevesahl | Peggy Salazar / Lisa Lepping | 1.9939 | +0.0091 | 2.0030 |
| 14 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Peggy Salazar | Lisa Lepping / Tracy Klevesahl | 2.0030 | -0.0049 | 1.9981 |
| 15 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Lisa Lepping | Peggy Salazar / Tracy Klevesahl | 1.9981 | +0.0150 | 2.0131 |
| 16 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-2 | Tracy Klevesahl | Peggy Salazar / Lisa Lepping | 2.0131 | +0.0082 | 2.0213 |
| 17 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 4-11 | Peggy Salazar | Christine Martin / Lisa Lepping | 2.0213 | -0.0076 | 2.0137 |
| 18 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Lisa Lepping | Peggy Salazar / Michelle Hopper | 2.0137 | -0.0059 | 2.0078 |
| 19 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Michelle Hopper | Christine Martin / Peggy Salazar | 2.0078 | -0.0120 | 1.9958 |
| 20 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Christine Martin | Lisa Lepping / Michelle Hopper | 1.9958 | -0.0050 | 1.9908 |
| 21 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Peggy Salazar | Sue Schey / Lisa Lepping | 1.9908 | +0.0142 | 2.0050 |
| 22 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 7-11 | Lisa Lepping | Peggy Salazar / Cathy Loughridge | 2.0050 | -0.0133 | 1.9917 |
| 23 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Sue Schey / Peggy Salazar | 1.9917 | -0.0035 | 1.9882 |
| 24 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Sue Schey | Lisa Lepping / Cathy Loughridge | 1.9882 | -0.0141 | 1.9741 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0253 | 1.9097 | +0.1156 | +0.0068 |
| 2 | 1.9764 | 1.9412 | -0.0352 | -0.0110 |
| 3 | 1.9203 | 1.9972 | +0.0769 | -0.0078 |
| 4 | 1.9125 | 2.0050 | +0.0925 | -0.0074 |
| 5 | 2.0662 | 2.4259 | +0.3598 | -0.0022 |
| 6 | 2.1151 | 1.9901 | +0.1250 | +0.0065 |
| 7 | 1.8995 | 2.3091 | +0.4096 | -0.0017 |
| 8 | 2.1154 | 2.0360 | -0.0794 | -0.0122 |
| 9 | 1.9591 | 2.1879 | -0.2288 | +0.0158 |
| 10 | 2.0262 | 1.8985 | +0.1277 | +0.0065 |
| 11 | 1.8944 | 2.0675 | +0.1731 | -0.0054 |
| 12 | 2.0798 | 1.9328 | +0.1470 | +0.0060 |
| 13 | 2.1457 | 2.1141 | +0.0316 | +0.0091 |
| 14 | 2.0331 | 2.2290 | +0.1959 | -0.0049 |
| 15 | 2.0328 | 2.2231 | -0.1903 | +0.0150 |
| 16 | 2.1589 | 2.0970 | +0.0619 | +0.0082 |
| 17 | 2.0375 | 2.1226 | +0.0852 | -0.0076 |
| 18 | 2.0480 | 2.1973 | +0.1493 | -0.0059 |
| 19 | 2.1589 | 2.0897 | -0.0693 | -0.0120 |
| 20 | 2.0429 | 2.2315 | +0.1886 | -0.0050 |
| 21 | 2.0175 | 2.1719 | -0.1544 | +0.0142 |
| 22 | 2.0357 | 1.9166 | -0.1191 | -0.0133 |
| 23 | 1.8905 | 2.1603 | +0.2697 | -0.0035 |
| 24 | 2.0733 | 1.9208 | -0.1525 | -0.0141 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.1156 -> computed delta +0.0068; 2.0000 +0.0068 = 2.0068