Storyline
Jackie Minyard entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 3.4510. Across 20 rated doubles games, the player went 11-9 and moved -0.0153, finishing at 3.4357.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The record was positive, but the rating dipped because the 11 wins added +0.0918 while the 9 loss(es) gave back -0.1071. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0139 against Lori Novack as partner and Amy Huckaby / Connie Nowell as opponents. In game #10 on 2026-08-13, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 3.2743 vs opponent team 3.1330.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Jackie's most common partner signals so far: Amy Huckaby (3-0, 100%), Judy Arlington (1-2, 33%), Kathy Battle (1-1, 50%), Lori Novack (0-2, 0%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Jackie has faced Amy Huckaby 6 times - record: 2-4. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | 3-1 | 3.4510 | 3.4673 | +0.0163 |
| 2026-07-16 | 2-2 | 3.4673 | 3.4569 | -0.0104 |
| 2026-08-13 | 3-1 | 3.4569 | 3.4665 | +0.0096 |
| 2026-08-20 | 1-3 | 3.4665 | 3.4405 | -0.0260 |
| 2026-08-27 | 2-2 | 3.4405 | 3.4357 | -0.0048 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-8 | Jean Narod | Sherry Airhart / Ann Moreland | 3.4510 | +0.0106 | 3.4616 |
| 2 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-7 | Amy Huckaby | Ann Moreland / Jean Narod | 3.4616 | +0.0133 | 3.4749 |
| 3 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-9 | Ann Moreland | Sherry Airhart / Amy Huckaby | 3.4749 | +0.0057 | 3.4806 |
| 4 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 3-11 | Sherry Airhart | Jean Narod / Amy Huckaby | 3.4806 | -0.0133 | 3.4673 |
| 5 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-9 | Nickie Gader | Judith Lee / Lori Novack | 3.4673 | +0.0045 | 3.4718 |
| 6 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 1-11 | Lori Novack | Judith Lee / Deborah Ahart | 3.4718 | -0.0121 | 3.4597 |
| 7 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-4 | Judith Lee | Nickie Gader / Deborah Ahart | 3.4597 | +0.0074 | 3.4671 |
| 8 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 7-11 | Deborah Ahart | Nickie Gader / Lori Novack | 3.4671 | -0.0102 | 3.4569 |
| 9 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-10 | Connie Nowell | Brenda Leardi / Amy Huckaby | 3.4569 | +0.0125 | 3.4694 |
| 10 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 9-11 | Lori Novack | Amy Huckaby / Connie Nowell | 3.4694 | -0.0139 | 3.4555 |
| 11 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-5 | Amy Huckaby | Brenda Leardi / Lori Novack | 3.4555 | +0.0061 | 3.4616 |
| 12 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-8 | Brenda Leardi | Connie Nowell / Lori Novack | 3.4616 | +0.0049 | 3.4665 |
| 13 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 6-11 | Judy Arlington | Zeneida Toledo / Kathy Battle | 3.4665 | -0.0107 | 3.4558 |
| 14 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 3-11 | Kathy Battle | Judy Arlington / Amy Huckaby | 3.4558 | -0.0122 | 3.4436 |
| 15 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-8 | Amy Huckaby | Zeneida Toledo / Judy Arlington | 3.4436 | +0.0093 | 3.4529 |
| 16 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 5-11 | Zeneida Toledo | Kathy Battle / Amy Huckaby | 3.4529 | -0.0124 | 3.4405 |
| 17 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 1-11 | Danielle George | Kathy Battle / Judy Arlington | 3.4405 | -0.0112 | 3.4293 |
| 18 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 10-11 | Judy Arlington | Kathy Battle / Danielle George | 3.4293 | -0.0111 | 3.4182 |
| 19 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-3 | Kathy Battle | Judy Arlington / Danielle George | 3.4182 | +0.0080 | 3.4262 |
| 20 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-1 | Judy Arlington | Kathy Battle / Danielle George | 3.4262 | +0.0095 | 3.4357 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.4203 | 3.4418 | -0.0215 | +0.0106 |
| 2 | 3.3196 | 3.4377 | -0.1180 | +0.0133 |
| 3 | 3.4722 | 3.3130 | +0.1592 | +0.0057 |
| 4 | 3.4261 | 3.3078 | -0.1183 | -0.0133 |
| 5 | 3.4369 | 3.2221 | +0.2148 | +0.0045 |
| 6 | 3.2749 | 3.1997 | -0.0752 | -0.0121 |
| 7 | 3.3431 | 3.2523 | +0.0907 | +0.0074 |
| 8 | 3.2549 | 3.2489 | -0.0059 | -0.0102 |
| 9 | 3.1785 | 3.2655 | -0.0870 | +0.0125 |
| 10 | 3.2743 | 3.1330 | -0.1414 | -0.0139 |
| 11 | 3.3395 | 3.1967 | +0.1428 | +0.0061 |
| 12 | 3.3044 | 3.1111 | +0.1933 | +0.0049 |
| 13 | 3.3550 | 3.3298 | -0.0252 | -0.0107 |
| 14 | 3.3671 | 3.2876 | -0.0795 | -0.0122 |
| 15 | 3.3471 | 3.3223 | +0.0248 | +0.0093 |
| 16 | 3.3932 | 3.3095 | -0.0837 | -0.0124 |
| 17 | 3.3421 | 3.2986 | -0.0436 | -0.0112 |
| 18 | 3.3394 | 3.3014 | -0.0380 | -0.0111 |
| 19 | 3.3647 | 3.2928 | +0.0720 | +0.0080 |
| 20 | 3.3251 | 3.3093 | +0.0158 | +0.0095 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff -0.0215 -> computed delta +0.0106; 3.4510 +0.0106 = 3.4616