Initial VIPR
2.3670
Registry seed
Current VIPR
2.4488
After latest rated game
Net Movement
+0.0818
Current minus initial
Record
24-12
67% win rate · 36 rated games
Storyline
Missi Horton entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.3670. Across 36 rated doubles games, the player went 24-12 and moved +0.0818, finishing at 2.4488.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 24-12 record produced +0.1919 from wins and -0.1101 from losses, for a net move of +0.0818. The biggest single-game impact was +0.0150 against Marcia Adelman as partner and Jackie Huckins / Deborah Austin as opponents. In game #35 on 2026-09-03, the player's team was the lower-rated team, so the win carried a larger gain: player team 2.4454 vs opponent team 2.6375.
Partner Chemistry
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Missi's most common partner signals so far: Lynne Becker (4-2, 67%), Cindy Halcomb (4-0, 100%), Lauren Esterlein (2-1, 67%), Deborah Austin (1-2, 33%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Streaks & Rivalries
Rivalry
Missi has faced Lynne Becker 10 times - record: 7-3. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | 2-2 | 2.3670 | 2.3673 | +0.0003 |
| 2026-07-09 | 3-1 | 2.3673 | 2.3718 | +0.0045 |
| 2026-07-16 | 4-0 | 2.3718 | 2.4017 | +0.0299 |
| 2026-07-23 | 3-1 | 2.4017 | 2.4140 | +0.0123 |
| 2026-08-06 | 2-2 | 2.4140 | 2.4025 | -0.0115 |
| 2026-08-13 | 3-1 | 2.4025 | 2.4169 | +0.0144 |
| 2026-08-20 | 2-2 | 2.4169 | 2.4268 | +0.0099 |
| 2026-08-27 | 3-1 | 2.4268 | 2.4433 | +0.0165 |
| 2026-09-03 | 2-2 | 2.4433 | 2.4488 | +0.0055 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-8 | Cindy Halcomb | Lauren Esterlein / Lynne Becker | 2.3670 | +0.0078 | 2.3748 |
| 2 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 8-11 | Janet Krasinski | Lauren Esterlein / Cindy Halcomb | 2.3748 | -0.0084 | 2.3664 |
| 3 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 8-11 | Lynne Becker | Janet Krasinski / Cindy Halcomb | 2.3664 | -0.0063 | 2.3601 |
| 4 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-8 | Lauren Esterlein | Janet Krasinski / Lynne Becker | 2.3601 | +0.0072 | 2.3673 |
| 5 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 7-11 | melinda moreno | Lynne Becker / Christine Martin | 2.3673 | -0.0090 | 2.3583 |
| 6 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-7 | Christine Martin | melinda moreno / Lynne Becker | 2.3583 | +0.0066 | 2.3649 |
| 7 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-10 | Lynne Becker | melinda moreno / Christine Martin | 2.3649 | +0.0035 | 2.3684 |
| 8 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-1 | Lynne Becker | melinda moreno / Christine Martin | 2.3684 | +0.0034 | 2.3718 |
| 9 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-9 | Lynne Becker | Kelly Gallagher / Christine Martin | 2.3718 | +0.0063 | 2.3781 |
| 10 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-3 | Christine Martin | Kelly Gallagher / Helen Burns | 2.3781 | +0.0087 | 2.3868 |
| 11 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-10 | Kelly Gallagher | Lynne Becker / Helen Burns | 2.3868 | +0.0057 | 2.3925 |
| 12 | 2026-07-16 | Win | 11-9 | Helen Burns | Lynne Becker / Christine Martin | 2.3925 | +0.0092 | 2.4017 |
| 13 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-3 | Lynn Ratcliff | Cindy Halcomb / Marie Shuey | 2.4017 | +0.0103 | 2.4120 |
| 14 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-0 | Marie Shuey | Lynn Ratcliff / Cathy Loughridge | 2.4120 | +0.0037 | 2.4157 |
| 15 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 3-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Cindy Halcomb / Lynn Ratcliff | 2.4157 | -0.0040 | 2.4117 |
| 16 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-3 | Cindy Halcomb | Marie Shuey / Cathy Loughridge | 2.4117 | +0.0023 | 2.4140 |
| 17 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-3 | Amy Fortier | Barbara Giometti / Lynn Ratcliff | 2.4140 | +0.0119 | 2.4259 |
| 18 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 3-11 | Lynn Ratcliff | Barbara Giometti / Lynne Becker | 2.4259 | -0.0145 | 2.4114 |
| 19 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-2 | Barbara Giometti | Amy Fortier / Lynne Becker | 2.4114 | +0.0060 | 2.4174 |
| 20 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 4-11 | Lynne Becker | Amy Fortier / Lynn Ratcliff | 2.4174 | -0.0149 | 2.4025 |
| 21 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 3-11 | Catherine Rozmiarek | Deborah Austin / Lori Stiegler | 2.4025 | -0.0016 | 2.4009 |
| 22 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-3 | Lori Stiegler | Catherine Rozmiarek / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4009 | +0.0032 | 2.4041 |
| 23 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-3 | Cindy Halcomb | Deborah Austin / Catherine Rozmiarek | 2.4041 | +0.0046 | 2.4087 |
| 24 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-10 | Deborah Austin | Lori Stiegler / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4087 | +0.0082 | 2.4169 |
| 25 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-10 | Jackie Huckins | Wendy Bachman / Deborah Austin | 2.4169 | +0.0145 | 2.4314 |
| 26 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 5-11 | Deborah Austin | Jackie Huckins / Lauren Esterlein | 2.4314 | -0.0108 | 2.4206 |
| 27 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 10-11 | Lauren Esterlein | Wendy Bachman / Jackie Huckins | 2.4206 | -0.0061 | 2.4145 |
| 28 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-5 | Wendy Bachman | Deborah Austin / Lauren Esterlein | 2.4145 | +0.0123 | 2.4268 |
| 29 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-0 | Cindy Halcomb | Lauren Esterlein / Janet Krasinski | 2.4268 | +0.0091 | 2.4359 |
| 30 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-5 | Lynne Becker | Cindy Halcomb / Lauren Esterlein | 2.4359 | +0.0142 | 2.4501 |
| 31 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-5 | Lauren Esterlein | Janet Krasinski / Lynne Becker | 2.4501 | +0.0061 | 2.4562 |
| 32 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 9-11 | Janet Krasinski | Cindy Halcomb / Lynne Becker | 2.4562 | -0.0129 | 2.4433 |
| 33 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 5-11 | Deborah Austin | Jackie Huckins / Coni Lentz | 2.4433 | -0.0105 | 2.4328 |
| 34 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-6 | Coni Lentz | Deborah Austin / Marcia Adelman | 2.4328 | +0.0121 | 2.4449 |
| 35 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-10 | Marcia Adelman | Jackie Huckins / Deborah Austin | 2.4449 | +0.0150 | 2.4599 |
| 36 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 2-11 | Jackie Huckins | Coni Lentz / Marcia Adelman | 2.4599 | -0.0111 | 2.4488 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.3874 | 2.3107 | +0.0767 | +0.0078 |
| 2 | 2.3848 | 2.4424 | +0.0576 | -0.0084 |
| 3 | 2.2801 | 2.4151 | +0.1350 | -0.0063 |
| 4 | 2.3873 | 2.2876 | +0.0997 | +0.0072 |
| 5 | 2.0958 | 2.1295 | +0.0337 | -0.0090 |
| 6 | 2.1744 | 2.0509 | +0.1235 | +0.0066 |
| 7 | 2.2719 | 2.0054 | +0.2665 | +0.0035 |
| 8 | 2.2754 | 2.0019 | +0.2735 | +0.0034 |
| 9 | 2.2788 | 2.1431 | +0.1356 | +0.0063 |
| 10 | 2.1757 | 2.1295 | +0.0462 | +0.0087 |
| 11 | 2.2839 | 2.1224 | +0.1615 | +0.0057 |
| 12 | 2.1728 | 2.1460 | +0.0267 | +0.0092 |
| 13 | 2.3416 | 2.3507 | -0.0091 | +0.0103 |
| 14 | 2.3335 | 2.0742 | +0.2593 | +0.0037 |
| 15 | 2.1092 | 2.3501 | +0.2409 | -0.0040 |
| 16 | 2.4245 | 2.0681 | +0.3564 | +0.0023 |
| 17 | 2.1360 | 2.2037 | -0.0676 | +0.0119 |
| 18 | 2.3372 | 2.1667 | -0.1705 | -0.0145 |
| 19 | 2.2356 | 2.0892 | +0.1463 | +0.0060 |
| 20 | 2.2859 | 2.0993 | -0.1867 | -0.0149 |
| 21 | 2.1093 | 2.5326 | +0.4233 | -0.0016 |
| 22 | 2.4132 | 2.1244 | +0.2888 | +0.0032 |
| 23 | 2.4194 | 2.2094 | +0.2100 | +0.0046 |
| 24 | 2.5101 | 2.4484 | +0.0617 | +0.0082 |
| 25 | 2.4649 | 2.6343 | -0.1694 | +0.0145 |
| 26 | 2.5241 | 2.4980 | -0.0261 | -0.0108 |
| 27 | 2.4332 | 2.5760 | +0.1428 | -0.0061 |
| 28 | 2.4606 | 2.5402 | -0.0796 | +0.0123 |
| 29 | 2.4360 | 2.4047 | +0.0314 | +0.0091 |
| 30 | 2.2851 | 2.4419 | -0.1568 | +0.0142 |
| 31 | 2.4249 | 2.2798 | +0.1451 | +0.0061 |
| 32 | 2.4024 | 2.2977 | -0.1046 | -0.0129 |
| 33 | 2.5216 | 2.5057 | -0.0159 | -0.0105 |
| 34 | 2.4455 | 2.5210 | -0.0755 | +0.0121 |
| 35 | 2.4454 | 2.6375 | -0.1921 | +0.0150 |
| 36 | 2.5045 | 2.4658 | -0.0387 | -0.0111 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0767 -> computed delta +0.0078; 2.3670 +0.0078 = 2.3748