Storyline
Janet Krasinski entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.4220. Across 32 rated doubles games, the player went 13-19 and moved -0.0591, finishing at 2.3629.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 13-19 record produced +0.0998 from wins and -0.1589 from losses, for a net move of -0.0591. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0160 against Cindy Halcomb as partner and Lynne Becker / Christine Martin as opponents. In game #32 on 2026-09-03, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.4009 vs opponent team 2.1609.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Janet's most common partner signals so far: Cindy Halcomb (3-1, 75%), Deborah Austin (1-2, 33%), Lauren Esterlein (1-2, 33%), Lynne Becker (1-2, 33%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Janet has faced Cindy Halcomb 9 times - record: 3-6. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | 1-3 | 2.4220 | 2.3988 | -0.0232 |
| 2026-07-09 | 2-2 | 2.3988 | 2.3949 | -0.0039 |
| 2026-07-16 | 0-4 | 2.3949 | 2.3657 | -0.0292 |
| 2026-07-23 | 3-1 | 2.3657 | 2.3797 | +0.0140 |
| 2026-08-06 | 2-2 | 2.3797 | 2.3900 | +0.0103 |
| 2026-08-20 | 2-2 | 2.3900 | 2.3877 | -0.0023 |
| 2026-08-27 | 1-3 | 2.3877 | 2.3664 | -0.0213 |
| 2026-09-03 | 2-2 | 2.3664 | 2.3629 | -0.0035 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 9-11 | Lauren Esterlein | Cindy Halcomb / Lynne Becker | 2.4220 | -0.0139 | 2.4081 |
| 2 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 8-11 | Missi Horton | Lauren Esterlein / Cindy Halcomb | 2.4081 | -0.0084 | 2.3997 |
| 3 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-8 | Cindy Halcomb | Lynne Becker / Missi Horton | 2.3997 | +0.0063 | 2.4060 |
| 4 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 8-11 | Lynne Becker | Lauren Esterlein / Missi Horton | 2.4060 | -0.0072 | 2.3988 |
| 5 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 7-11 | Deborah Homan | Kim Held / Coni Lentz | 2.3988 | -0.0073 | 2.3915 |
| 6 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-9 | Coni Lentz | Deborah Homan / Amy Fortier | 2.3915 | +0.0031 | 2.3946 |
| 7 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 0-11 | Amy Fortier | Kim Held / Deborah Homan | 2.3946 | -0.0033 | 2.3913 |
| 8 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-8 | Kim Held | Coni Lentz / Amy Fortier | 2.3913 | +0.0036 | 2.3949 |
| 9 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 8-11 | Marcia Adelman | Cynthia Speiran / Deborah Austin | 2.3949 | -0.0051 | 2.3898 |
| 10 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 7-11 | Cheryl Prochilo | Cynthia Speiran / Marcia Adelman | 2.3898 | -0.0112 | 2.3786 |
| 11 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 3-11 | Deborah Austin | Cheryl Prochilo / Marcia Adelman | 2.3786 | -0.0101 | 2.3685 |
| 12 | 2026-07-16 | Loss | 3-11 | Cynthia Speiran | Cheryl Prochilo / Deborah Austin | 2.3685 | -0.0028 | 2.3657 |
| 13 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-6 | Amy Fortier | Barbara Giometti / Pamela Uriarte | 2.3657 | +0.0083 | 2.3740 |
| 14 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-5 | Deborah Austin | Barbara Giometti / Amy Fortier | 2.3740 | +0.0016 | 2.3756 |
| 15 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-6 | Pamela Uriarte | Deborah Austin / Amy Fortier | 2.3756 | +0.0137 | 2.3893 |
| 16 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 10-11 | Barbara Giometti | Deborah Austin / Pamela Uriarte | 2.3893 | -0.0096 | 2.3797 |
| 17 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-8 | Marcia Adelman | Deborah Austin / Coni Lentz | 2.3797 | +0.0144 | 2.3941 |
| 18 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-8 | Coni Lentz | Deborah Austin / Marcia Adelman | 2.3941 | +0.0137 | 2.4078 |
| 19 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 6-11 | Deborah Austin | Coni Lentz / Marcia Adelman | 2.4078 | -0.0118 | 2.3960 |
| 20 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 4-11 | Marcia Adelman | Deborah Austin / Coni Lentz | 2.3960 | -0.0060 | 2.3900 |
| 21 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-6 | Cindy Halcomb | Barbara Giometti / melinda moreno | 2.3900 | +0.0019 | 2.3919 |
| 22 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-3 | Barbara Giometti | melinda moreno / Cindy Halcomb | 2.3919 | +0.0066 | 2.3985 |
| 23 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 10-11 | melinda moreno | Barbara Giometti / Cindy Halcomb | 2.3985 | -0.0055 | 2.3930 |
| 24 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 0-11 | melinda moreno | Barbara Giometti / Cindy Halcomb | 2.3930 | -0.0053 | 2.3877 |
| 25 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 0-11 | Lauren Esterlein | Missi Horton / Cindy Halcomb | 2.3877 | -0.0091 | 2.3786 |
| 26 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-6 | Cindy Halcomb | Lauren Esterlein / Lynne Becker | 2.3786 | +0.0068 | 2.3854 |
| 27 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 5-11 | Lynne Becker | Missi Horton / Lauren Esterlein | 2.3854 | -0.0061 | 2.3793 |
| 28 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 9-11 | Missi Horton | Cindy Halcomb / Lynne Becker | 2.3793 | -0.0129 | 2.3664 |
| 29 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-6 | Lynne Becker | Cindy Halcomb / Lauren Esterlein | 2.3664 | +0.0142 | 2.3806 |
| 30 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 8-11 | Christine Martin | Lauren Esterlein / Lynne Becker | 2.3806 | -0.0073 | 2.3733 |
| 31 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-8 | Lauren Esterlein | Cindy Halcomb / Christine Martin | 2.3733 | +0.0056 | 2.3789 |
| 32 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 8-11 | Cindy Halcomb | Lynne Becker / Christine Martin | 2.3789 | -0.0160 | 2.3629 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.4346 | 2.2922 | -0.1424 | -0.0139 |
| 2 | 2.3848 | 2.4424 | +0.0576 | -0.0084 |
| 3 | 2.4151 | 2.2801 | +0.1350 | +0.0063 |
| 4 | 2.2876 | 2.3873 | +0.0997 | -0.0072 |
| 5 | 2.3872 | 2.4847 | +0.0975 | -0.0073 |
| 6 | 2.4212 | 2.1264 | +0.2948 | +0.0031 |
| 7 | 2.1274 | 2.4104 | +0.2830 | -0.0033 |
| 8 | 2.4223 | 2.1560 | +0.2663 | +0.0036 |
| 9 | 2.4025 | 2.5902 | +0.1878 | -0.0051 |
| 10 | 2.4826 | 2.4415 | -0.0411 | -0.0112 |
| 11 | 2.5079 | 2.5047 | -0.0032 | -0.0101 |
| 12 | 2.4124 | 2.7285 | +0.3162 | -0.0028 |
| 13 | 2.1264 | 2.0666 | +0.0598 | +0.0083 |
| 14 | 2.4971 | 2.0732 | +0.4239 | +0.0016 |
| 15 | 2.1204 | 2.2572 | -0.1368 | +0.0137 |
| 16 | 2.2338 | 2.2490 | +0.0152 | -0.0096 |
| 17 | 2.3979 | 2.5641 | -0.1662 | +0.0144 |
| 18 | 2.4128 | 2.5487 | -0.1359 | +0.0137 |
| 19 | 2.5116 | 2.4499 | -0.0617 | -0.0118 |
| 20 | 2.4131 | 2.5599 | +0.1468 | -0.0060 |
| 21 | 2.4085 | 2.0182 | +0.3903 | +0.0019 |
| 22 | 2.2289 | 2.1046 | +0.1243 | +0.0066 |
| 23 | 2.0835 | 2.2500 | +0.1665 | -0.0055 |
| 24 | 2.0780 | 2.2555 | +0.1775 | -0.0053 |
| 25 | 2.4047 | 2.4360 | +0.0314 | -0.0091 |
| 26 | 2.4050 | 2.2896 | +0.1155 | +0.0068 |
| 27 | 2.2798 | 2.4249 | +0.1451 | -0.0061 |
| 28 | 2.4024 | 2.2977 | -0.1046 | -0.0129 |
| 29 | 2.2789 | 2.4358 | -0.1569 | +0.0142 |
| 30 | 2.2052 | 2.3007 | +0.0955 | -0.0073 |
| 31 | 2.3853 | 2.2234 | +0.1619 | +0.0056 |
| 32 | 2.4009 | 2.1609 | -0.2400 | -0.0160 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff -0.1424 -> computed delta -0.0139; 2.4220 -0.0139 = 2.4081