Initial VIPR
2.3420
Registry seed
Current VIPR
2.3063
After latest rated game
Net Movement
-0.0357
Current minus initial
Record
11-13
46% win rate · 24 rated games
Storyline
Marie Shuey entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.3420. Across 24 rated doubles games, the player went 11-13 and moved -0.0357, finishing at 2.3063.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 11-13 record produced +0.0815 from wins and -0.1172 from losses, for a net move of -0.0357. The biggest single-game impact was +0.0156 against Janet Krasinski as partner and Deborah Austin / Lauren Esterlein as opponents. In game #19 on 2026-09-17, the player's team was the lower-rated team, so the win carried a larger gain: player team 2.3103 vs opponent team 2.5296.
Partner Chemistry
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Marie's most common partner signals so far: Barbara Giometti (1-2, 33%), Cindy Halcomb (1-2, 33%), Christine Martin (2-0, 100%), Cheryl King (1-1, 50%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Streaks & Rivalries
Rivalry
Marie has faced Barbara Giometti 7 times - record: 3-4. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-09 | 2-2 | 2.3420 | 2.3344 | -0.0076 |
| 2026-07-16 | 1-3 | 2.3344 | 2.3101 | -0.0243 |
| 2026-07-23 | 1-3 | 2.3101 | 2.2859 | -0.0242 |
| 2026-08-13 | 3-1 | 2.2859 | 2.2941 | +0.0082 |
| 2026-09-17 | 2-2 | 2.2941 | 2.2986 | +0.0045 |
| 2026-10-15 | 2-2 | 2.2986 | 2.3063 | +0.0077 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-9 | Cindy Halcomb | Kelly Gallagher / Barbara Giometti | 2.3420 | +0.0051 | 2.3471 |
| 2 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Barbara Giometti | Cindy Halcomb / Kelly Gallagher | 2.3471 | +0.0131 | 2.3602 |
| 3 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Kelly Gallagher | Cindy Halcomb / Barbara Giometti | 2.3602 | -0.0109 | 2.3493 |
| 4 | 2026-07-09 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Cindy Halcomb | Kelly Gallagher / Barbara Giometti | 2.3493 | -0.0149 | 2.3344 |
| 5 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Joy McCormick | Barbara Giometti / Pamela Uriarte | 2.3344 | +0.0025 | 2.3369 |
| 6 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Pamela Uriarte | Barbara Giometti / Lynn Ratcliff | 2.3369 | -0.0064 | 2.3305 |
| 7 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Barbara Giometti | Joy McCormick / Lynn Ratcliff | 2.3305 | -0.0058 | 2.3247 |
| 8 | 2026-07-16 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 9-11 | Lynn Ratcliff | Joy McCormick / Pamela Uriarte | 2.3247 | -0.0146 | 2.3101 |
| 9 | 2026-07-23 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Cindy Halcomb | Lynn Ratcliff / Missi Horton | 2.3101 | -0.0103 | 2.2998 |
| 10 | 2026-07-23 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-0 | Missi Horton | Lynn Ratcliff / Cathy Loughridge | 2.2998 | +0.0037 | 2.3035 |
| 11 | 2026-07-23 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 8-11 | Lynn Ratcliff | Cindy Halcomb / Cathy Loughridge | 2.3035 | -0.0153 | 2.2882 |
| 12 | 2026-07-23 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 3-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Cindy Halcomb / Missi Horton | 2.2882 | -0.0023 | 2.2859 |
| 13 | 2026-08-13 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Christine Martin | Helen Burns / Cathy Loughridge | 2.2859 | +0.0057 | 2.2916 |
| 14 | 2026-08-13 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-5 | Helen Burns | Christine Martin / Cathy Loughridge | 2.2916 | +0.0061 | 2.2977 |
| 15 | 2026-08-13 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Loss | 4-11 | Cathy Loughridge | Christine Martin / Helen Burns | 2.2977 | -0.0089 | 2.2888 |
| 16 | 2026-08-13 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - SUMMER 2026 |
Win | 11-8 | Christine Martin | Helen Burns / Cathy Loughridge | 2.2888 | +0.0053 | 2.2941 |
| 17 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-6 | Lauren Esterlein | Barbara Giometti / Janet Krasinski | 2.2941 | +0.0070 | 2.3011 |
| 18 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Deborah Austin | Barbara Giometti / Lauren Esterlein | 2.3011 | -0.0139 | 2.2872 |
| 19 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Janet Krasinski | Deborah Austin / Lauren Esterlein | 2.2872 | +0.0156 | 2.3028 |
| 20 | 2026-09-17 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Summer 2026 |
Loss | 0-11 | Barbara Giometti | Deborah Austin / Janet Krasinski | 2.3028 | -0.0042 | 2.2986 |
| 21 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 10-11 | Cheryl King | Helen Burns / Kathy Sutyak | 2.2986 | -0.0058 | 2.2928 |
| 22 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Helen Burns | Cheryl King / Kathy Sutyak | 2.2928 | -0.0039 | 2.2889 |
| 23 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Kathy Sutyak | Cheryl King / Helen Burns | 2.2889 | +0.0030 | 2.2919 |
| 24 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-10 | Cheryl King | Helen Burns / Kathy Sutyak | 2.2919 | +0.0144 | 2.3063 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.3766 | 2.1915 | +0.1851 | +0.0051 |
| 2 | 2.2114 | 2.3235 | -0.1121 | +0.0131 |
| 3 | 2.2836 | 2.2512 | -0.0324 | -0.0109 |
| 4 | 2.3826 | 2.1960 | -0.1866 | -0.0149 |
| 5 | 2.3931 | 2.0580 | +0.3351 | +0.0025 |
| 6 | 2.0997 | 2.2296 | +0.1300 | -0.0064 |
| 7 | 2.2364 | 2.3904 | +0.1540 | -0.0058 |
| 8 | 2.3264 | 2.1537 | -0.1727 | -0.0146 |
| 9 | 2.3507 | 2.3416 | -0.0091 | -0.0103 |
| 10 | 2.3335 | 2.0742 | +0.2593 | +0.0037 |
| 11 | 2.3092 | 2.1043 | -0.2049 | -0.0153 |
| 12 | 2.0681 | 2.4245 | +0.3564 | -0.0023 |
| 13 | 2.1553 | 1.9953 | +0.1601 | +0.0057 |
| 14 | 2.1426 | 1.9975 | +0.1451 | +0.0061 |
| 15 | 2.0510 | 2.0891 | +0.0380 | -0.0089 |
| 16 | 2.1622 | 1.9836 | +0.1786 | +0.0053 |
| 17 | 2.3452 | 2.2363 | +0.1088 | +0.0070 |
| 18 | 2.4048 | 2.2615 | -0.1433 | -0.0139 |
| 19 | 2.3103 | 2.5296 | -0.2193 | +0.0156 |
| 20 | 2.2207 | 2.4510 | +0.2303 | -0.0042 |
| 21 | 2.2600 | 2.4170 | +0.1571 | -0.0058 |
| 22 | 2.2157 | 2.4613 | +0.2456 | -0.0039 |
| 23 | 2.4984 | 2.1976 | +0.3008 | +0.0030 |
| 24 | 2.2545 | 2.4201 | -0.1656 | +0.0144 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.1851 -> computed delta +0.0051; 2.3420 +0.0051 = 2.3471