Storyline
Elena Gordon entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 3.0010. Across 20 rated doubles games, the player went 10-10 and moved -0.0198, finishing at 2.9812.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 10-10 record produced +0.0881 from wins and -0.1079 from losses, for a net move of -0.0198. The biggest single-game impact was +0.0173 against Joy McCormick as partner and Rose Kopja / Kathi Lancaster as opponents. In game #19 on 2026-08-27, the player's team was the lower-rated team, so the win carried a larger gain: player team 2.7340 vs opponent team 3.0582.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Elena's most common partner signals so far: Rose Kopja (2-3, 40%), Jennifer A Hamm (1-2, 33%), Nancy Krau (1-1, 50%), Brenda Leardi (1-0, 100%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Elena has faced Rose Kopja 8 times - record: 5-3. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | 3-1 | 3.0010 | 3.0183 | +0.0173 |
| 2026-07-09 | 2-2 | 3.0183 | 3.0176 | -0.0007 |
| 2026-07-23 | 2-2 | 3.0176 | 3.0116 | -0.0060 |
| 2026-08-06 | 1-3 | 3.0116 | 2.9904 | -0.0212 |
| 2026-08-27 | 2-2 | 2.9904 | 2.9812 | -0.0092 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-3 | Dawn Mead | Nancy Krau / Dana Gainer | 3.0010 | +0.0090 | 3.0100 |
| 2 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 7-11 | Rose Kopja | Dana Gainer / Dawn Mead | 3.0100 | -0.0109 | 2.9991 |
| 3 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-5 | Dana Gainer | Nancy Krau / Rose Kopja | 2.9991 | +0.0085 | 3.0076 |
| 4 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-4 | Nancy Krau | Dawn Mead / Rose Kopja | 3.0076 | +0.0107 | 3.0183 |
| 5 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-6 | Tricia Gallagher | Karen Scott / Ann Thiel | 3.0183 | +0.0096 | 3.0279 |
| 6 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-4 | Rose Kopja | Ann Thiel / Tricia Gallagher | 3.0279 | +0.0113 | 3.0392 |
| 7 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 6-11 | Ann Thiel | Karen Scott / Rose Kopja | 3.0392 | -0.0104 | 3.0288 |
| 8 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 1-11 | Karen Scott | Tricia Gallagher / Rose Kopja | 3.0288 | -0.0112 | 3.0176 |
| 9 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-6 | Jennifer A Hamm | Rose Kopja / Beth Arms | 3.0176 | +0.0079 | 3.0255 |
| 10 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 5-11 | Barbara Amato | Jennifer A Hamm / Rose Kopja | 3.0255 | -0.0068 | 3.0187 |
| 11 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-4 | Rose Kopja | Beth Arms / Barbara Amato | 3.0187 | +0.0052 | 3.0239 |
| 12 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 7-11 | Beth Arms | Jennifer A Hamm / Barbara Amato | 3.0239 | -0.0123 | 3.0116 |
| 13 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 5-11 | Jennifer A Hamm | Brenda Leardi / Nancy Krau | 3.0116 | -0.0107 | 3.0009 |
| 14 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 2-11 | Nancy Krau | Jennifer A Hamm / Brenda Leardi | 3.0009 | -0.0061 | 2.9948 |
| 15 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-1 | Brenda Leardi | Jennifer A Hamm / Nancy Krau | 2.9948 | +0.0058 | 3.0006 |
| 16 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 4-11 | Jennifer A Hamm | Brenda Leardi / Nancy Krau | 3.0006 | -0.0102 | 2.9904 |
| 17 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 7-11 | Rose Kopja | Joy McCormick / Kathi Lancaster | 2.9904 | -0.0151 | 2.9753 |
| 18 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-6 | Kathi Lancaster | Rose Kopja / Joy McCormick | 2.9753 | +0.0028 | 2.9781 |
| 19 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-7 | Joy McCormick | Rose Kopja / Kathi Lancaster | 2.9781 | +0.0173 | 2.9954 |
| 20 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 9-11 | Rose Kopja | Joy McCormick / Kathi Lancaster | 2.9954 | -0.0142 | 2.9812 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9583 | 2.9235 | +0.0348 | +0.0090 |
| 2 | 2.9785 | 2.9469 | -0.0316 | -0.0109 |
| 3 | 2.9696 | 2.9169 | +0.0526 | +0.0085 |
| 4 | 2.9270 | 2.9499 | -0.0229 | +0.0107 |
| 5 | 3.0317 | 3.0171 | +0.0146 | +0.0096 |
| 6 | 2.9692 | 3.0157 | -0.0465 | +0.0113 |
| 7 | 2.9978 | 2.9824 | -0.0154 | -0.0104 |
| 8 | 3.0369 | 2.9945 | -0.0424 | -0.0112 |
| 9 | 2.9929 | 2.9199 | +0.0730 | +0.0079 |
| 10 | 2.8579 | 2.9751 | +0.1172 | -0.0068 |
| 11 | 2.9922 | 2.8090 | +0.1832 | +0.0052 |
| 12 | 2.9183 | 2.8372 | -0.0811 | -0.0123 |
| 13 | 3.0012 | 2.9777 | -0.0235 | -0.0107 |
| 14 | 2.9186 | 3.0603 | +0.1417 | -0.0061 |
| 15 | 3.0683 | 2.9117 | +0.1566 | +0.0058 |
| 16 | 2.9906 | 2.9836 | -0.0070 | -0.0102 |
| 17 | 2.9935 | 2.7968 | -0.1968 | -0.0151 |
| 18 | 3.0520 | 2.7383 | +0.3138 | +0.0028 |
| 19 | 2.7340 | 3.0582 | -0.3242 | +0.0173 |
| 20 | 2.9745 | 2.8177 | -0.1569 | -0.0142 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0348 -> computed delta +0.0090; 3.0010 +0.0090 = 3.0100