Storyline
Carol Spano entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.5490. Across 20 rated doubles games, the player went 11-9 and moved +0.0198, finishing at 2.5688.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 11-9 record produced +0.1077 from wins and -0.0879 from losses, for a net move of +0.0198. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0191 against Pilar Winters as partner and Pamela Uriarte / Amy Fortier as opponents. In game #12 on 2026-08-20, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.5887 vs opponent team 2.0518.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Carol's most common partner signals so far: Beth Arms (2-1, 67%), Tammy Wilson (2-0, 100%), Pamela Uriarte (1-1, 50%), Pilar Winters (1-1, 50%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Carol has faced Pamela Uriarte 6 times - record: 3-3. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | 2-2 | 2.5490 | 2.5596 | +0.0106 |
| 2026-07-09 | 3-1 | 2.5596 | 2.5846 | +0.0250 |
| 2026-08-20 | 3-1 | 2.5846 | 2.5868 | +0.0022 |
| 2026-08-27 | 2-2 | 2.5868 | 2.6018 | +0.0150 |
| 2026-09-03 | 1-3 | 2.6018 | 2.5688 | -0.0330 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 7-11 | Cheryl Prochilo | Tammy Wilson / Jackie Huckins | 2.5490 | -0.0080 | 2.5410 |
| 2 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-7 | Tammy Wilson | Courtney Robinson / Cheryl Prochilo | 2.5410 | +0.0133 | 2.5543 |
| 3 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 7-11 | Jackie Huckins | Courtney Robinson / Cheryl Prochilo | 2.5543 | -0.0071 | 2.5472 |
| 4 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-9 | Tammy Wilson | Courtney Robinson / Jackie Huckins | 2.5472 | +0.0124 | 2.5596 |
| 5 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-10 | Joy McCormick | Kathi Lancaster / Jackie Huckins | 2.5596 | +0.0167 | 2.5763 |
| 6 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-2 | Cynthia Speiran | Jackie Huckins / Joy McCormick | 2.5763 | +0.0117 | 2.5880 |
| 7 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 2-11 | Jackie Huckins | Kathi Lancaster / Cynthia Speiran | 2.5880 | -0.0071 | 2.5809 |
| 8 | 2026-07-09 | Win | 11-2 | Kathi Lancaster | Joy McCormick / Cynthia Speiran | 2.5809 | +0.0037 | 2.5846 |
| 9 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-1 | Pamela Uriarte | Amy Fortier / Pilar Winters | 2.5846 | +0.0098 | 2.5944 |
| 10 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-6 | Pilar Winters | Pamela Uriarte / Amy Fortier | 2.5944 | +0.0008 | 2.5952 |
| 11 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-5 | Amy Fortier | Pamela Uriarte / Pilar Winters | 2.5952 | +0.0107 | 2.6059 |
| 12 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 8-11 | Pilar Winters | Pamela Uriarte / Amy Fortier | 2.6059 | -0.0191 | 2.5868 |
| 13 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 10-11 | Debbie Chaffee | Barbara Amato / Beth Arms | 2.5868 | -0.0058 | 2.5810 |
| 14 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 2-11 | Yvonne Delacruz | Debbie Chaffee / Barbara Amato | 2.5810 | -0.0048 | 2.5762 |
| 15 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-6 | Barbara Amato | Beth Arms / Yvonne Delacruz | 2.5762 | +0.0132 | 2.5894 |
| 16 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-7 | Beth Arms | Debbie Chaffee / Yvonne Delacruz | 2.5894 | +0.0124 | 2.6018 |
| 17 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 9-11 | Kim Johnson | Beth Arms / Pamela Uriarte | 2.6018 | -0.0180 | 2.5838 |
| 18 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 8-11 | Pamela Uriarte | Kim Johnson / Beth Arms | 2.5838 | -0.0005 | 2.5833 |
| 19 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 10-11 | Beth Arms | Kim Johnson / Pamela Uriarte | 2.5833 | -0.0175 | 2.5658 |
| 20 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-3 | Beth Arms | Kim Johnson / Pamela Uriarte | 2.5658 | +0.0030 | 2.5688 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5953 | 2.6672 | +0.0719 | -0.0080 |
| 2 | 2.5873 | 2.7063 | -0.1189 | +0.0133 |
| 3 | 2.5880 | 2.6930 | +0.1050 | -0.0071 |
| 4 | 2.5957 | 2.6792 | -0.0835 | +0.0124 |
| 5 | 2.5347 | 2.8162 | -0.2815 | +0.0167 |
| 6 | 2.5076 | 2.5676 | -0.0599 | +0.0117 |
| 7 | 2.5972 | 2.7012 | +0.1040 | -0.0071 |
| 8 | 2.7671 | 2.5066 | +0.2605 | +0.0037 |
| 9 | 2.2198 | 2.2136 | +0.0062 | +0.0098 |
| 10 | 2.5922 | 2.0484 | +0.5438 | +0.0008 |
| 11 | 2.2044 | 2.2283 | -0.0239 | +0.0107 |
| 12 | 2.5887 | 2.0518 | -0.5368 | -0.0191 |
| 13 | 2.6683 | 2.8225 | +0.1542 | -0.0058 |
| 14 | 2.6241 | 2.8233 | +0.1991 | -0.0048 |
| 15 | 2.6470 | 2.7642 | -0.1171 | +0.0132 |
| 16 | 2.6688 | 2.7542 | -0.0854 | +0.0124 |
| 17 | 2.6952 | 2.3165 | -0.3787 | -0.0180 |
| 18 | 2.2443 | 2.8876 | +0.6433 | -0.0005 |
| 19 | 2.6738 | 2.3375 | -0.3363 | -0.0175 |
| 20 | 2.6563 | 2.3550 | +0.3013 | +0.0030 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0719 -> computed delta -0.0080; 2.5490 -0.0080 = 2.5410