Storyline
Amy Fortier entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.0000. Across 32 rated doubles games, the player went 12-20 and moved +0.0845, finishing at 2.0845.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The record was below .500, but the rating rose because the 12 win(s) added +0.1670 against stronger situations while the 20 losses cost -0.0825. The biggest single-game impact was +0.0191 against Pamela Uriarte as partner and Carol Spano / Pilar Winters as opponents. In game #24 on 2026-08-20, the player's team was the lower-rated team, so the win carried a larger gain: player team 2.0518 vs opponent team 2.5887.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Amy's most common partner signals so far: Pamela Uriarte (3-1, 75%), Janet Krasinski (1-1, 50%), melinda moreno (1-1, 50%), Barbara Giometti (0-2, 0%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Amy has faced Pamela Uriarte 7 times - record: 4-3. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | 3-1 | 2.0000 | 2.0199 | +0.0199 |
| 2026-07-09 | 0-4 | 2.0199 | 2.0060 | -0.0139 |
| 2026-07-23 | 2-2 | 2.0060 | 2.0169 | +0.0109 |
| 2026-08-06 | 2-2 | 2.0169 | 2.0324 | +0.0155 |
| 2026-08-13 | 1-3 | 2.0324 | 2.0475 | +0.0151 |
| 2026-08-20 | 2-2 | 2.0475 | 2.0667 | +0.0192 |
| 2026-08-27 | 1-3 | 2.0667 | 2.0756 | +0.0089 |
| 2026-09-03 | 1-3 | 2.0756 | 2.0845 | +0.0089 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-4 | Catherine Rozmiarek | melinda moreno / Pamela Uriarte | 2.0000 | +0.0100 | 2.0100 |
| 2 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-5 | melinda moreno | Catherine Rozmiarek / Pamela Uriarte | 2.0100 | +0.0100 | 2.0200 |
| 3 | 2026-07-02 | Win | 11-2 | Pamela Uriarte | Catherine Rozmiarek / melinda moreno | 2.0200 | +0.0102 | 2.0302 |
| 4 | 2026-07-02 | Loss | 8-11 | melinda moreno | Catherine Rozmiarek / Pamela Uriarte | 2.0302 | -0.0103 | 2.0199 |
| 5 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 9-11 | Deborah Homan | Coni Lentz / Janet Krasinski | 2.0199 | -0.0031 | 2.0168 |
| 6 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 5-11 | Kim Held | Coni Lentz / Deborah Homan | 2.0168 | -0.0039 | 2.0129 |
| 7 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 0-11 | Janet Krasinski | Kim Held / Deborah Homan | 2.0129 | -0.0033 | 2.0096 |
| 8 | 2026-07-09 | Loss | 8-11 | Coni Lentz | Kim Held / Janet Krasinski | 2.0096 | -0.0036 | 2.0060 |
| 9 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-9 | Pamela Uriarte | Deborah Austin / Barbara Giometti | 2.0060 | +0.0179 | 2.0239 |
| 10 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-6 | Janet Krasinski | Barbara Giometti / Pamela Uriarte | 2.0239 | +0.0083 | 2.0322 |
| 11 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 5-11 | Barbara Giometti | Deborah Austin / Janet Krasinski | 2.0322 | -0.0016 | 2.0306 |
| 12 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 6-11 | Deborah Austin | Pamela Uriarte / Janet Krasinski | 2.0306 | -0.0137 | 2.0169 |
| 13 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-3 | Missi Horton | Barbara Giometti / Lynn Ratcliff | 2.0169 | +0.0119 | 2.0288 |
| 14 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 2-11 | Lynne Becker | Missi Horton / Barbara Giometti | 2.0288 | -0.0060 | 2.0228 |
| 15 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 9-11 | Barbara Giometti | Lynn Ratcliff / Lynne Becker | 2.0228 | -0.0053 | 2.0175 |
| 16 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-4 | Lynn Ratcliff | Missi Horton / Lynne Becker | 2.0175 | +0.0149 | 2.0324 |
| 17 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 6-11 | Fern S Reisinger | Nancy Krau / Michele Chew | 2.0324 | -0.0008 | 2.0316 |
| 18 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-9 | Laurie Watson | Michele Chew / Fern S Reisinger | 2.0316 | +0.0189 | 2.0505 |
| 19 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 1-11 | Michele Chew | Nancy Krau / Laurie Watson | 2.0505 | -0.0011 | 2.0494 |
| 20 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 9-11 | Nancy Krau | Fern S Reisinger / Laurie Watson | 2.0494 | -0.0019 | 2.0475 |
| 21 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 1-11 | Pilar Winters | Pamela Uriarte / Carol Spano | 2.0475 | -0.0098 | 2.0377 |
| 22 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 6-11 | Pamela Uriarte | Carol Spano / Pilar Winters | 2.0377 | -0.0008 | 2.0369 |
| 23 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-5 | Carol Spano | Pamela Uriarte / Pilar Winters | 2.0369 | +0.0107 | 2.0476 |
| 24 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-8 | Pamela Uriarte | Carol Spano / Pilar Winters | 2.0476 | +0.0191 | 2.0667 |
| 25 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 6-11 | Fern S Reisinger | Wendy Bachman / Cynthia Speiran | 2.0667 | -0.0034 | 2.0633 |
| 26 | 2026-08-27 | Win | 11-3 | Cynthia Speiran | Wendy Bachman / Coni Lentz | 2.0633 | +0.0172 | 2.0805 |
| 27 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 8-11 | Wendy Bachman | Fern S Reisinger / Coni Lentz | 2.0805 | -0.0029 | 2.0776 |
| 28 | 2026-08-27 | Loss | 5-11 | Coni Lentz | Fern S Reisinger / Cynthia Speiran | 2.0776 | -0.0020 | 2.0756 |
| 29 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 10-11 | Wendy Bachman | Kim Held / Pilar Winters | 2.0756 | -0.0026 | 2.0730 |
| 30 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-10 | Marjorie Fassnacht | Pilar Winters / Wendy Bachman | 2.0730 | +0.0179 | 2.0909 |
| 31 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 7-11 | Pilar Winters | Kim Held / Marjorie Fassnacht | 2.0909 | -0.0032 | 2.0877 |
| 32 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 2-11 | Kim Held | Wendy Bachman / Marjorie Fassnacht | 2.0877 | -0.0032 | 2.0845 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0000 | 2.0000 | +0.0000 | +0.0100 |
| 2 | 1.9960 | 1.9960 | +0.0000 | +0.0100 |
| 3 | 1.9920 | 2.0000 | -0.0080 | +0.0102 |
| 4 | 2.0019 | 1.9899 | -0.0120 | -0.0103 |
| 5 | 2.1264 | 2.4212 | +0.2948 | -0.0031 |
| 6 | 2.1604 | 2.4084 | +0.2480 | -0.0039 |
| 7 | 2.1274 | 2.4104 | +0.2830 | -0.0033 |
| 8 | 2.1560 | 2.4223 | +0.2663 | -0.0036 |
| 9 | 2.0028 | 2.3772 | -0.3744 | +0.0179 |
| 10 | 2.1264 | 2.0666 | +0.0598 | +0.0083 |
| 11 | 2.0732 | 2.4971 | +0.4239 | -0.0016 |
| 12 | 2.2572 | 2.1204 | -0.1368 | -0.0137 |
| 13 | 2.1360 | 2.2037 | -0.0676 | +0.0119 |
| 14 | 2.0892 | 2.2356 | +0.1463 | -0.0060 |
| 15 | 2.0658 | 2.2424 | +0.1766 | -0.0053 |
| 16 | 2.0993 | 2.2859 | -0.1867 | +0.0149 |
| 17 | 2.2366 | 2.7980 | +0.5614 | -0.0008 |
| 18 | 2.2249 | 2.7274 | -0.5025 | +0.0189 |
| 19 | 2.2586 | 2.7511 | +0.4926 | -0.0011 |
| 20 | 2.2996 | 2.6941 | +0.3945 | -0.0019 |
| 21 | 2.2136 | 2.2198 | +0.0062 | -0.0098 |
| 22 | 2.0484 | 2.5922 | +0.5438 | -0.0008 |
| 23 | 2.2044 | 2.2283 | -0.0239 | +0.0107 |
| 24 | 2.0518 | 2.5887 | -0.5368 | +0.0191 |
| 25 | 2.2551 | 2.5325 | +0.2774 | -0.0034 |
| 26 | 2.1989 | 2.5167 | -0.3178 | +0.0172 |
| 27 | 2.2264 | 2.5369 | +0.3105 | -0.0029 |
| 28 | 2.1943 | 2.5782 | +0.3839 | -0.0020 |
| 29 | 2.2241 | 2.5528 | +0.3287 | -0.0026 |
| 30 | 2.1949 | 2.5658 | -0.3709 | +0.0179 |
| 31 | 2.2277 | 2.5135 | +0.2858 | -0.0032 |
| 32 | 2.2278 | 2.5153 | +0.2876 | -0.0032 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0000 -> computed delta +0.0100; 2.0000 +0.0100 = 2.0100