Storyline
Pilar Winters entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 2.6330. Across 20 rated doubles games, the player went 6-14 and moved -0.0983, finishing at 2.5347.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 6-14 record produced +0.0483 from wins and -0.1466 from losses, for a net move of -0.0983. The biggest single-game impact was -0.0191 against Carol Spano as partner and Pamela Uriarte / Amy Fortier as opponents. In game #16 on 2026-08-20, VIPR expected the player's team to have the edge, so the loss carried a larger drop: player team 2.5887 vs opponent team 2.0518.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Pilar's most common partner signals so far: Marjorie Fassnacht (1-2, 33%), ANN DREWEK (1-1, 50%), Carol Spano (1-1, 50%), Kim Held (1-1, 50%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Pilar has faced Kim Held 5 times - record: 1-4. A tough matchup so far.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-23 | 2-2 | 2.6330 | 2.6343 | +0.0013 |
| 2026-08-06 | 1-3 | 2.6343 | 2.6233 | -0.0110 |
| 2026-08-13 | 1-3 | 2.6233 | 2.6010 | -0.0223 |
| 2026-08-20 | 1-3 | 2.6010 | 2.5622 | -0.0388 |
| 2026-09-03 | 1-3 | 2.5622 | 2.5347 | -0.0275 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 5-11 | ANN DREWEK | Joy McCormick / Michele Chew | 2.6330 | -0.0110 | 2.6220 |
| 2 | 2026-07-23 | Loss | 4-11 | Michele Chew | Joy McCormick / ANN DREWEK | 2.6220 | -0.0118 | 2.6102 |
| 3 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-3 | Joy McCormick | Michele Chew / ANN DREWEK | 2.6102 | +0.0142 | 2.6244 |
| 4 | 2026-07-23 | Win | 11-10 | ANN DREWEK | Joy McCormick / Michele Chew | 2.6244 | +0.0099 | 2.6343 |
| 5 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 10-11 | Debbie Chaffee | Beth Arms / Kim Johnson | 2.6343 | -0.0056 | 2.6287 |
| 6 | 2026-08-06 | Win | 11-9 | Kim Johnson | Debbie Chaffee / Wendy Bachman | 2.6287 | +0.0090 | 2.6377 |
| 7 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 6-11 | Wendy Bachman | Beth Arms / Debbie Chaffee | 2.6377 | -0.0035 | 2.6342 |
| 8 | 2026-08-06 | Loss | 3-11 | Beth Arms | Kim Johnson / Wendy Bachman | 2.6342 | -0.0109 | 2.6233 |
| 9 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 8-11 | Kim Held | Jackie Huckins / Marjorie Fassnacht | 2.6233 | -0.0124 | 2.6109 |
| 10 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 2-11 | Jackie Huckins | Kim Held / Marjorie Fassnacht | 2.6109 | -0.0131 | 2.5978 |
| 11 | 2026-08-13 | Loss | 10-11 | Marjorie Fassnacht | Kim Held / Jackie Huckins | 2.5978 | -0.0086 | 2.5892 |
| 12 | 2026-08-13 | Win | 11-1 | Marjorie Fassnacht | Kim Held / Jackie Huckins | 2.5892 | +0.0118 | 2.6010 |
| 13 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 1-11 | Amy Fortier | Pamela Uriarte / Carol Spano | 2.6010 | -0.0098 | 2.5912 |
| 14 | 2026-08-20 | Win | 11-6 | Carol Spano | Pamela Uriarte / Amy Fortier | 2.5912 | +0.0008 | 2.5920 |
| 15 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 5-11 | Pamela Uriarte | Carol Spano / Amy Fortier | 2.5920 | -0.0107 | 2.5813 |
| 16 | 2026-08-20 | Loss | 8-11 | Carol Spano | Pamela Uriarte / Amy Fortier | 2.5813 | -0.0191 | 2.5622 |
| 17 | 2026-09-03 | Win | 11-10 | Kim Held | Amy Fortier / Wendy Bachman | 2.5622 | +0.0026 | 2.5648 |
| 18 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 10-11 | Wendy Bachman | Amy Fortier / Marjorie Fassnacht | 2.5648 | -0.0179 | 2.5469 |
| 19 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 7-11 | Amy Fortier | Kim Held / Marjorie Fassnacht | 2.5469 | -0.0032 | 2.5437 |
| 20 | 2026-09-03 | Loss | 5-11 | Marjorie Fassnacht | Kim Held / Wendy Bachman | 2.5437 | -0.0090 | 2.5347 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6606 | 2.6266 | -0.0340 | -0.0110 |
| 2 | 2.6748 | 2.6123 | -0.0625 | -0.0118 |
| 3 | 2.5895 | 2.7438 | -0.1544 | +0.0142 |
| 4 | 2.6505 | 2.6480 | +0.0026 | +0.0099 |
| 5 | 2.7053 | 2.8674 | +0.1621 | -0.0056 |
| 6 | 2.7066 | 2.6719 | +0.0347 | +0.0090 |
| 7 | 2.5940 | 2.8613 | +0.2672 | -0.0035 |
| 8 | 2.7035 | 2.6709 | -0.0325 | -0.0109 |
| 9 | 2.5729 | 2.4897 | -0.0832 | -0.0124 |
| 10 | 2.5985 | 2.4858 | -0.1127 | -0.0131 |
| 11 | 2.5126 | 2.5604 | +0.0478 | -0.0086 |
| 12 | 2.5040 | 2.5690 | -0.0650 | +0.0118 |
| 13 | 2.2136 | 2.2198 | +0.0062 | -0.0098 |
| 14 | 2.5922 | 2.0484 | +0.5438 | +0.0008 |
| 15 | 2.2283 | 2.2044 | -0.0239 | -0.0107 |
| 16 | 2.5887 | 2.0518 | -0.5368 | -0.0191 |
| 17 | 2.5528 | 2.2241 | +0.3287 | +0.0026 |
| 18 | 2.5658 | 2.1949 | -0.3709 | -0.0179 |
| 19 | 2.2277 | 2.5135 | +0.2858 | -0.0032 |
| 20 | 2.5156 | 2.5520 | +0.0364 | -0.0090 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff -0.0340 -> computed delta -0.0110; 2.6330 -0.0110 = 2.6220