Storyline
Cindy Hilderbrand entered VIPR with an initial registry rating of 3.3810. Across 16 rated doubles games, the player went 9-7 and moved +0.0482, finishing at 3.4292.
Why It Moved
AI-generated explanation: The 9-7 record produced +0.0946 from wins and -0.0464 from losses, for a net move of +0.0482. The biggest single-game impact was +0.0187 against Cindy Demaio as partner and Michele Blanchard / Jackie Elliott as opponents. In game #5 on 2026-10-15, the player's team was the lower-rated team, so the win carried a larger gain: player team 3.1881 vs opponent team 3.6490.
Partnership patterns are starting to emerge.
Cindy's most common partner signals so far: Susan Mulvihill (0-2, 0%), Cindy Demaio (1-0, 100%), Jackie Elliott (1-0, 100%), Janet Artrip (1-0, 100%). No partnership has reached both the 8+ match and 75%+ win-rate marker yet, so treat this as directional.
Cindy has faced Patricia Jones 3 times - record: 1-2. A close matchup worth watching.
Session Summary
| Date | W-L | Start | End | Net |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-01 | 2-2 | 3.3810 | 3.3842 | +0.0032 |
| 2026-10-15 | 3-1 | 3.3842 | 3.4078 | +0.0236 |
| 2026-10-22 | 1-3 | 3.4078 | 3.4050 | -0.0028 |
| 2026-10-29 | 3-1 | 3.4050 | 3.4292 | +0.0242 |
Game-By-Game Rating Trail
| # | Date | Result | Score | Partner | Opponents | Before | Change | After |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 7-11 | Susan Mulvihill | Patricia Jones / Rosemarie Rizzuto | 3.3810 | -0.0089 | 3.3721 |
| 2 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-1 | Rosemarie Rizzuto | Susan Mulvihill / Patricia Jones | 3.3721 | +0.0137 | 3.3858 |
| 3 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-4 | Patricia Jones | Susan Mulvihill / Rosemarie Rizzuto | 3.3858 | +0.0066 | 3.3924 |
| 4 | 2026-10-01 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 6-11 | Susan Mulvihill | Patricia Jones / Rosemarie Rizzuto | 3.3924 | -0.0082 | 3.3842 |
| 5 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-7 | Cindy Demaio | Michele Blanchard / Jackie Elliott | 3.3842 | +0.0187 | 3.4029 |
| 6 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Kim Christopherson | Michele Blanchard / Cindy Demaio | 3.4029 | +0.0041 | 3.4070 |
| 7 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-7 | Jackie Elliott | Kim Christopherson / Cindy Demaio | 3.4070 | +0.0056 | 3.4126 |
| 8 | 2026-10-15 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Michele Blanchard | Kim Christopherson / Jackie Elliott | 3.4126 | -0.0048 | 3.4078 |
| 9 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 0-11 | Kathy Gelb | Tina Stephens / Janet Artrip | 3.4078 | -0.0067 | 3.4011 |
| 10 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 0-11 | Carolyn Roan | Janet Artrip / Kathy Gelb | 3.4011 | -0.0026 | 3.3985 |
| 11 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-5 | Janet Artrip | Tina Stephens / Carolyn Roan | 3.3985 | +0.0128 | 3.4113 |
| 12 | 2026-10-22 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 5-11 | Tina Stephens | Kathy Gelb / Carolyn Roan | 3.4113 | -0.0063 | 3.4050 |
| 13 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-10 | Suzie Dunn | Melissa Terhark / Nancy Grzesiek | 3.4050 | +0.0116 | 3.4166 |
| 14 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-3 | Janice Czerwinski | Melissa Terhark / Suzie Dunn | 3.4166 | +0.0104 | 3.4270 |
| 15 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Loss | 2-11 | Nancy Grzesiek | Janice Czerwinski / Suzie Dunn | 3.4270 | -0.0089 | 3.4181 |
| 16 | 2026-10-29 Thursday Ladies Ladder League - Fall 2026 |
Win | 11-5 | Melissa Terhark | Janice Czerwinski / Nancy Grzesiek | 3.4181 | +0.0111 | 3.4292 |
Formula Homework
These rows show the team ratings used in the adjustment calculation. The computed delta is the signed rating change produced by the current v0.6 formula.
| # | Player Team ( AVG ) | Opponent Team ( AVG ) | Winner-Loser VIPR Diff | Computed Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3846 | 3.4235 | +0.0389 | -0.0089 |
| 2 | 3.3398 | 3.4731 | -0.1334 | +0.0137 |
| 3 | 3.4702 | 3.3488 | +0.1214 | +0.0066 |
| 4 | 3.3724 | 3.4352 | +0.0629 | -0.0082 |
| 5 | 3.1881 | 3.6490 | -0.4609 | +0.0187 |
| 6 | 3.5097 | 3.2742 | +0.2355 | +0.0041 |
| 7 | 3.4759 | 3.3119 | +0.1640 | +0.0056 |
| 8 | 3.4759 | 3.6768 | +0.2009 | -0.0048 |
| 9 | 3.5752 | 3.6953 | +0.1201 | -0.0067 |
| 10 | 3.4369 | 3.7665 | +0.3296 | -0.0026 |
| 11 | 3.4849 | 3.5856 | -0.1007 | +0.0128 |
| 12 | 3.5073 | 3.6419 | +0.1346 | -0.0063 |
| 13 | 3.4167 | 3.4729 | -0.0562 | +0.0116 |
| 14 | 3.4500 | 3.4643 | -0.0143 | +0.0104 |
| 15 | 3.4343 | 3.4732 | +0.0389 | -0.0089 |
| 16 | 3.4348 | 3.4740 | -0.0391 | +0.0111 |
Rating movement formula
Team VIPR = average - (average - lower partner) * CRF, with CRF = 0.40.
Adjustment = 0.02 / (1 + 10 ^ (2.5 * (winner team VIPR - loser team VIPR))).
Winning partners both receive +adjustment. Losing partners both receive -adjustment.
Score margin is recorded for context but is not currently part of the v0.6 formula.
First game check: winner-loser VIPR diff +0.0389 -> computed delta -0.0089; 3.3810 -0.0089 = 3.3721